On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, billinghurst <billinghu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> If you are talking about how we represent digitally prepared text with the > validation process. I would have no issue with the text being ripped and > having a bot run through and taking it straight to level 4 (green), and > then redefining green to say validated, or digitally prepared text not > requiring validation. > > At the same time, if someone proposed and generates a fifth colour to > represent digitally prepared text not requiring proofreading, then I will > be happy with that. It may make someone happier in being a truer > representation, but in the end to me it is a moot point. In the end, each > of those is a local community decision, though one that should be made in > consideration of how the other wikis interpret their processes. > Thanks for clarifying this. I agree with you, and would welcome both solutions. But a lot of wikisourcerors don't think this way, so better discuss :-) Aubrey
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
