On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Gerard Meijssen<gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Suppose that someone fixes a test that has been always failing... one of > those "known to fail". It makes no difference right ??
Difference in what sense? It means we have one less failing test reported, presumably. > Giving them the > status of pass is imho dead wrong because they should not fail in the first > place.. now a status of KNOWN TO FAIL makes sense. The known-failing tests have never passed. They're a wishlist. None of them are likely to be fixed in the foreseeable future. I'd be fine with just removing them, but Brion has been against it in the past. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
