Praveen Prakash wrote: > Is it possible to implement some method to tell server both characters > are same??
No. > It is heard that more changes coming in future versions of > unicode. And now almost half of the data coming is in unicode 5.1 > version. I am not sure about reverse converting. That link you gave in your last post had a conversion table, it looks pretty straightforward: CHILLU NN -> NNA, VIRAMA, ZWJ CHILLU N -> NA, VIRAMA, ZWJ CHILLU RR -> RA, VIRAMA, ZWJ CHILLU L -> LA, VIRAMA, ZWJ CHILLU LL -> LLA, VIRAMA, ZWJ The other new characters would remain unconverted. Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > Given that we should be moving forward not backward, it makes more sense to > provide Unicode 5.1 characters and webfonts. > > The big thing of MediaWiki was that it supported Unicode when this was still > a new thing to do. We should support the latest and the best Unicode > support. You did read the post didn't you? Forcing everyone to buy Windows 7 is not generally the way we do things. Unless the client situation is not as bad as it sounds, we will need to have a transition period where we support older clients until their market share falls far lower than 50%, which is where, by Praveen's figures, it is now. -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
