Hi, There are so many extensions useful to the enterprise but probably also so many which are not useful at all or not maintained and if I wanted to start a corporate wiki right now I would probably be very lost what to look at and how people do things, so it seemed like a good idea to list the extensions that ARE actually used. Also, I guess one team solved a certain problem one way, while another solved it differenty, using a different extension or set of extensions, so writing this out might help everybody get new ideas/ avoid reinventing the wheel. But I guess I either asked on the wrong list or there is not much interest at all.
Mariya On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov <ques...@rambler.ru> wrote: > On 14.02.2013 21:14, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote: > >> I guess this would not directly solve any of the problems listed, but >>> would >>> it be helpful to bring back to life >>> https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Enterprise_hub<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Enterprise_hub>? >>> It was started by somebody >>> an year or two ago but seems to have been abandoned at a draft stage. I >>> am >>> thinking if everybody adds some information about extensions/pages they >>> find particularly useful in the enterprise world, it will help future >>> users >>> but also help current enterprise wikis exchange experience. Does this >>> seem >>> worthwhile? >>> >> >> IMHO there are so much useful extensions that I think it can be a little >> much for that page. >> >> For example if I edited that article I would put almost all extensions >> from our distribution there... so I'm documenting them on >> http://wiki.4intra.net/**Category:Mediawiki4Intranet_**extensions<http://wiki.4intra.net/Category:Mediawiki4Intranet_extensions>:-) >> >> The question is, how much they are stable and secure. MediaWiki is > high-quality software that should not be impaired by low-quality extension. > Also, when extension is unmaintained, it's stability and security becomes > questional as well. > Also, I remember for major MW extensions scalability is the big problem. > Efficient SQL queries, using APC / Memcached cache, not invalidating parser > cache too often. For example my own Extension:QPoll is not well-scaling > requiring some major rewrites. That applies to many of another extensions > as well. > Dmitriy > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
