Can we please avoid jumping to conclusions like “Ladsgroup [was] enforcing the CoC out of their personal feelings” or that this was an “immediate escalation”, when the only information we have in this thread is a quoted email that the author probably never intended to be a comprehensive summary of the situation in the first place, and which was only relayed to this list through a non-neutral party?
Cheers, Lucas Am Mi., 8. Aug. 2018 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb Dan Garry <dga...@wikimedia.org>: > On 8 August 2018 at 14:29, Alex Monk <kren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Are you trying to ban people discussing CoC committee decisions publicly? > > Not that it even looks like he wrote grievances. > > > Hardly. I have absolutely nothing to do with the administration of this > list, nor the authority to set what is discussed on this list, nor any > involvement in the Code of Conduct, all of which you are well aware. > > Dan > > -- > Dan Garry > Lead Product Manager, Editing > Wikimedia Foundation > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Lucas Werkmeister Software Developer (working student) Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Phone: +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0 https://wikimedia.de Imagine a world, in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That‘s our commitment. Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
