In general I would prefer to keep vulgar language out of the projects, as it doesn't bring anything positive. Research shows that swearing causes stress [1], and there are many ways of showing dissatisfaction without using coarse language.
For instance, I would appreciate if there would be more interest in using Nonviolent Communication, as it is more effective in getting the message across than with negativity. Introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-129JLTjkQ Regards, Micru [1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022341 On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM Bináris <wikipo...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's what I called a very first world problem. > This happens when American culture and behavioral standard is extended to > an international community. > It is not rally polite to write that F-thing (how many times has it been > written directly or abbreviated or indirectly in this very discussion?). > But to ban a member of the technical community from the working environment > is really harmful. > Although we do block people from editing Wikipedia, too, but we do it > publicly, clearly, comparably, and by the rules of the local community, not > by hidden rules of admin board. And not for one ugly word. > This secret banning undermines the community, and therefore it is > destructive. > > Additionally, as code of conduxt itself was discussed here, the coc file > case was discussed here a few weeks ago, and this is the place where most > Phabricatos users communicate, this is a good place to discuss this case, > too. Publicity is good. > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Etiamsi omnes, ego non _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
