James Hawkins wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We didn't have a new winetest executable for the last few days. MinGW >> doesn't >> know anything about a d3dx9 dll (yet) that's imported in the d3dx9_36 tests. >> >> Especially while in the process of getting ready for 1.0 we should have >> winetest >> run as much as possible. >> >> My main focus will be adding tests btw until 1.0 is out. These will be both >> tests to proof the correctness of the current implementation as well as >> tests to >> show missing stuff. There are loads of functions for which we have no tests >> yet >> and with the 1.0 in sight I think it becomes very important to have tests >> for >> virtually every function we (have) implement(ed). >> > > While that's a worthy goal, I think a better short-term goal for the > run up to 1.0 is to fix the current failing tests in Windows. > But either way we need an up-to-date winetest executable ;-)
Fixing currently failing tests is as always top on my list as well until I have some real time to spend again on implementing stuff. -- Cheers, Paul.
