"John Klehm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that it is a mingw issue but they don't want any > patches from wines win32 api in their mingw w32api. They believe that > looking at the actual ms header files taints our headers legally > speaking. Stefan, hans, and PaulM maintain a rather large set of > patches against w32api. [1] > > So its a constant catchup game from when wines headers get new > additions until someone sends paulm a patch updating the mingw w32api.
Then perhaps we (Alexandre) should reconsider the stance about using Wine headers and import libraries in preference to mingw ones. -- Dmitry.
