Alexandre Julliard wrote: > "John Klehm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> P.S. I logged some test results from my win2k machine, it seems they >> are at [5]. Seems like I missed some setting though as the date is >> not right. Advice on how to fix that would be delicious =) > > It's now using the git commit sha1 instead of a date when building from > a git tree, that's a feature. I'm hoping we can standardize on that to > make sure all test runs properly identify the exact source used. >
Wouldn't it be nicer to have something like: 0.9.58-06d429d6b6b6d63beaeda130a3bb261ef3b9fb41 Just a thought? The SHA's itself are not very pleasant for the eye. With the above you can at least group them visually. -- Cheers, Paul.
