On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James Hawkins wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We didn't have a new winetest executable for the last few days. MinGW > doesn't > >> know anything about a d3dx9 dll (yet) that's imported in the d3dx9_36 > tests. > >> > >> Especially while in the process of getting ready for 1.0 we should have > winetest > >> run as much as possible. > >> > >> My main focus will be adding tests btw until 1.0 is out. These will be > both > >> tests to proof the correctness of the current implementation as well as > tests to > >> show missing stuff. There are loads of functions for which we have no > tests yet > >> and with the 1.0 in sight I think it becomes very important to have > tests for > >> virtually every function we (have) implement(ed). > >> > > > > While that's a worthy goal, I think a better short-term goal for the > > run up to 1.0 is to fix the current failing tests in Windows. > > > But either way we need an up-to-date winetest executable ;-) >
Are you currently working on this? Is it a problem that needs to be fixed on the mingw side? -- James Hawkins