On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We didn't have a new winetest executable for the last few days. MinGW doesn't > know anything about a d3dx9 dll (yet) that's imported in the d3dx9_36 tests. > > Especially while in the process of getting ready for 1.0 we should have > winetest > run as much as possible. > > My main focus will be adding tests btw until 1.0 is out. These will be both > tests to proof the correctness of the current implementation as well as > tests to > show missing stuff. There are loads of functions for which we have no tests > yet > and with the 1.0 in sight I think it becomes very important to have tests for > virtually every function we (have) implement(ed). >
While that's a worthy goal, I think a better short-term goal for the run up to 1.0 is to fix the current failing tests in Windows. -- James Hawkins
