Blair,

You must be reading my mind! Your post fits my scenario perfectly.

-RickG

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Blair Davis <the...@wmwisp.net> wrote:

>  Some simple numbers...
>
> $1700/month for 10Mbits.  Much better than the $600 per 1.54Mbit I was
> paying out here.
>
> 1Mbit per Netflix or IPTV user.
>
> $170 cost of bandwidth per user.
>
> Users out here are not going to pay that.  Period.
>
> The problem, out in the rural areas at least, is not delivering the
> bandwidth, it is getting it at a reasonable cost.
>
> These apps use an order of magnitude more bandwidth than the standard web
> browsing and email apps we are used to.  But the users don't and won't
> understand that.
>
> If you went to buy a new TV and it used an order of magnitude more power to
> run it, your electric bill would soon show you the error of your ways.
>
> The only real solution to this problem is to move to per bit pricing.  That
> way, users will see the cost of what they are doing and adjust their usage
> to what they are willing to pay for.
>
> Netflix, IPTV and other apps like them simply shift the their cost of doing
> business to us.  Unless we either refuse to support these apps, or begin
> billing our users for them, it will kill us.
>
> The cable and dsl providers are starting to figure this out.
>
> Blair
>
>
>
>
> Tom DeReggi wrote:
>
>  Why is the wireless world happy with being 10 years behind the wired
> world?
>
>
>  Depends who you are referring by stating "wireless world".
>
> The WISP providers are surely NOT "happy" with that.  They are just
> realistic about what they have available.
> And they are creative enough to understand that there are still markets
> willing to deal with that, because WISPs have other things to offer of equal
> or greater value, to creat a WISP market.
>
> I'm also not sure the public is "happy" with that. I haven't heard one
> public advocate at Broadband public meetings advocating "Please give money
> to wireless companies so we can have slower service".  Wireless will be a
> part of Stimulus grants because... We can argue we'll get you service
> sooner, and we'll stretch the dollar further to serve more areas and people,
> so less people get left without being served, and more people get better
> service than they currently have. In the long run, with Wireless, consumers
> will have to compromise for less, in exchange for the instant gratification
> that can be gained today.
>
> WISPs deal with it because comparatively they are either broke, lazy, or
> impatient, in order to meet demand. Or I should say, don't want to end up
> broke.
> I'm not meaning to be derogatory in using those terms. What I mean is...
>
> Sure we'd all like to lay fiber.  We just don't want to wait 20 years for an
> ROI (impatient :-). We don't have millions and billions of Finance capabilty
> upfront (broke :-).
> We don't want to spend years trying to get permits and negotiating easements
> with entities that care less about advancing our cause quickly (lazy :-).
> The truth is Monopolies are willing to do all these things.  But they also
> grudgingly backout of their committments and delay as long as possible,
> because honestly they don't want to do it either, and are even more lazy,
> and clearly have all the time in the world, without competition forcing them
> to work harder.
>
> The truth is, Wireless providers DO NEED faster equipment.  And the Truth
> is, we really aren't "lazy". (I was just kidding before :-)
>
> So.... WiMax vendors,  Make us faster equipment!!! That we can Afford
> today!!!
>
> There is a lot of grant money comming up this year. Here is your chance for
> volume orders, from the WISP market. Give us a reason to stay wireless
> providers and not to become a fiber provider. Backhaul transport providers
> are doing their part. But I think last mile manufacturers still have to do a
> better job. But more importantly give grant Decission makers a reason to
> favor wireless. Give them speeds that public advocates will be excited
> about. And give us price points that will let us do microcells to accomplish
> top penetration.  Wimax isn;t competing against wifi anymore, they are
> competing against fiber. I admit, Its a tall order to fill.  But I think
> clever innovators should be able to fill it.
>
> $7 billion is not a lot to come anywhere close to helping "All" Americans
> get next generation broadband.  But $7 billion is a hech of a lot of money
> to inject into an ISP manufacturer industry. Lets just say $1 billion of it
> would go to Wireless infrastructure. Thats a lot of gear.  Lets start
> getting creative with those volume order low price offers? How low can you
> go to get a peice of that $billion?
>
> Manufacturers, Let us know! The industry is writing their grant proposals
> now.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Suitor" <ksui...@redlinecommunications.com> 
> <ksui...@redlinecommunications.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 3:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>
>
>
>  Folks,
>
> I seem to have too much time on my hands since I'm on vacation.  This
> thread prompted me to put a quick back of the napkin ROI analysis
> together to see which service options I'd want to be pushing on the
> market.
>
> What I did was review Bell Canada's service offer - why, because they
> offer Wireless, DSL & Fiber based Internet services in competition to
> Rogers Cable and Cogeco Cable (ON) and Videotron and Cogeco Cable(Qc)
> along with a variety of WISPs, satellite providers, in other words the
> entire spectrum of competition.  As many of you may know Canada ranks in
> the top 10 worldwide for broadband penetration according to the latest
> OECD rankings with 23.8% BB penetration, the United States ranked 15th
> with 19.6% penetration.
>
> I opted not to include their wireless offer in the model.  For the
> record their 512/512 Portable Internet service using an AC powered
> indoor CPE as the terminal device selling for $17.95/month; they offer a
> 2000/800 Rural service with either indoor or outdoor CPE beginning at
> $40/month; and a 3000/1000 Portable using the same indoor CPE as in the
> first offer.  All CPE are sold at $99 to the customer.
>
> What I've done is outline the UL/DL speeds, cost per month, and a
> sliding scale of oversubscription rates (actual rate used by Bell seems
> to be between 20 and 40 based upon historical data depending on take-up
> rate in an area.  This then generates a kbps / subscriber figure which
> was then divided into the capacity per sector (I'm using the average
> real world sector capacity from our worldwide base of 7 MHz RedMAX
> customers as reported by our Redline Management Suite application that
> we use to monitor production networks under a professional services
> agreement).  I then divided this by the avg kbps/client to calculate the
> maximum subscribers per sector.  I then took the peak subs multiplied by
> monthly ARPU to calculate the monthly and annual peak revenue stream per
> sector.  The required CAPEX per sector was calculated based upon a
> sector controller, shared common costs (GPS, UPS, tower climb, and other
> site acquisition costs - WW avg.) and the cost of the number of CPE
> required by the peak subscriber calculation.  The ROI in months is the
> CAPEX divided by the monthly ARPU.
>
> I've highlighted the sweet spot avg 18 month ROI lines in each model
> that indicates with between 19 and 229 subscribers, depending upon the
> SLA you'd be able to achieve and ROI acceptable to almost any financier
> using WiMAX.
>
> Cheers!
> Kevin
>
>
> NOTE: Modeled upon Bell Canada's Internet Service offer when using a
> WiMAX BTS to deliver the stated SLAs (all are best effort, residential
> services on a 7 MHz channel with mix of LOS and NLOS customers):
>
> Monthly Max Subs per
> Sector Monthly ARPU / Annual ARPU / Required CAPEX / ROI
> ARPU kbps Down kbps Up Total kbps Oversubscription
> kbps Required/Sub 16000 loaded sector loaded sector loaded
> sector (months)
> $    17.95 Essential 500 500 1000 40 25
> 640 $          11,488.00 $     137,856.00 $
> 300,750 26.17949
> $    27.95 Essential+ 2000 800 2800 40 70
> 229 $            6,388.57 $       76,662.86 $
> 115,607 18.09593
> $    37.95 Performance 7000 1000 8000 40 200
> 80 $            3,036.00 $       36,432.00 $
> 48,750 16.05731
> $    42.95 MAX10 10000 1000 11000 40 275
> 58 $            2,498.91 $       29,986.91 $
> 38,932 15.57953
> $    72.95 MAX16 16000 1000 17000 40 425
> 38 $            2,746.35 $       32,956.24 $
> 29,691 10.81113
>
>
> Monthly Max Subs per
> Sector Monthly ARPU / Annual ARPU / Required CAPEX / ROI
> ARPU kbps Down kbps Up Total kbps Oversubscription
> kbps Required/Sub 16000 loaded sector loaded sector loaded
> sector (months)
> $    17.95 Essential 500 500 1000 30 33
> 480 $            8,616.00 $     103,392.00 $
> 228,750 26.54944
> $    27.95 Essential+ 2000 800 2800 30 93
> 171 $            4,791.43 $       57,497.14 $
> 89,893 18.76118
> $    37.95 Performance 7000 1000 8000 30 267
> 60 $            2,277.00 $       27,324.00 $
> 39,750 17.45718
> $    42.95 MAX10 10000 1000 11000 30 367
> 44 $            1,874.18 $       22,490.18 $
> 32,386 17.28027
> $    72.95 MAX16 16000 1000 17000 30 567
> 28 $            2,059.76 $       24,717.18 $
> 25,456 12.35864
>
>
> Monthly Max Subs per
> Sector Monthly ARPU / Annual ARPU / Required CAPEX / ROI
> ARPU kbps Down kbps Up Total kbps Oversubscription
> kbps Required/Sub 16000 loaded sector loaded sector loaded
> sector (months)
> $    17.95 Essential 500 500 1000 20 50
> 320 $            5,744.00 $       68,928.00 $
> 156,750 27.28935
> $    27.95 Essential+ 2000 800 2800 20 140
> 114 $            3,194.29 $       38,331.43 $
> 64,179 20.09168
> $    37.95 Performance 7000 1000 8000 20 400
> 40 $            1,518.00 $       18,216.00 $
> 30,750 20.25692
> $    42.95 MAX10 10000 1000 11000 20 550
> 29 $            1,249.45 $       14,993.45 $
> 25,841 20.68175
> $    72.95 MAX16 16000 1000 17000 20 850
> 19 $            1,373.18 $       16,478.12 $
> 21,221 15.45365
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:58 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
> 2 megs is yesterday's news.
>
> U-Verse is 18/1.5
> FiOS is 50/20
> Charter has 60/5
> Comcast has 50/10
>
> 2 megs is 36 times faster than 56k.  Charter is 30 times faster than
> that.
>
> Why is the wireless world happy with being 10 years behind the wired
> world?
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Kevin Suitor" <ksui...@redlinecommunications.com> 
> <ksui...@redlinecommunications.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 10:42 AM
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>
>
>  We have customers worldwide who operate sectors typically with
>
>
>  hundreds
>
>
>  of residential clients with 2 Mbps downlink / 256 or 512 kbps uplink
>
>
>  and
>
>
>  some with who run entry level service (by NA standards) of 384 kbps
> downlink / 128 kbps uplink that have an average of 250 clients per
> sector with 6 sectors per BTS in an urban market.
>
> The WiMAX MAC is much more sophisticated than other MACs used in
> wireless networking.
>
> Best Regards,
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
>
>
>  On
>
>
>  Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
> More troll than substance but I wouldn't put more than 30 users on a
> WiMAX
> AP anyway...  not enough bandwidth.
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Jeff Booher" <jefftho...@fastmail.fm> <jefftho...@fastmail.fm>
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>
>
>  It is not the same gear by any means. Tranzeo's AP is a micro base
> station,
> that only supports 30 subscribers.
>
> -
>
> Jeff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
>
>
>  On
>
>
>  Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:34 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
> I'm certainly interested in ptmp.
>
> The Tranzeo gear is the same as Aperto isn't it?
> marlon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> <g...@aeronetpr.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>
>
>
>  Ligowave its ptp in 3.65...
>
> Might wanna look at tranzeo for 3.65 ptmp
>
>
> Gino A. villarini...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
>
>
>  On
>
>
>  Behalf Of Leon Zetekoff
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
> Hi Marlon...I'd look at the Ligowave stuff similar in principle to
>
>
>  the
>
>
>  UBNT stuff but I think much better. That's what I'd do today.
>
> Take care leon
>
> Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
>
>
>  I'm looking into this too.
>
> So far I can't find a solution for rural towers.  A 3 sector
>
>
>   install
>
>
>   at $20k?  Not to service the 20 people that will be able to even
>
>
>   see
>
>
>   that tower....
>
> Anyone have any better ideas?
> marlon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> <g...@aeronetpr.com>
> To: "Motorola Canopy User Group" <motor...@wispa.org> <motor...@wispa.org>; 
> "WISPA
>
>
>   General
>
>
>  List"
>
>
>  <wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:55 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>
>
>
>
>  Fellow operators:
>
> Any updates on your experienes with 3.65 gear? PMP and PTP?
>
> Any updates on experiences with:
>
> Redline, Aperto, Tranzeo, Vecima, Alvarion, Ligowave, Solectek,
> Airspan ???
>
>
> Gino A. villarini...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
>
>
>
>              
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   --------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>             
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   --------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>             
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>             
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>           
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>          
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  ----
>
>
>  ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>          
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  --------
>
>
>  WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>          
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  --------
>
>
>  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>                 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  --------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>        
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  --------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>        
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
>  WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>        
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
>  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to