We know how to avoid routing loops. As I said before, RIP has been around for
decades and I know it well.
Our engineer wants to get us into OSPF, which I have no experience with and
don't understand. Since I don't really have anything to do with the operation
of my business anymore, it's likely that I will never understand OSPF and
that's why I'm having a problem.
It's philosophical. I have felt in the past like my hands were tied when one
person knew things about my network that I didn't know. I don't like that
feeling. I know that I can do RIP. I can fix whatever goes wrong if I need to.
If it's stable and works like it should ;)
Thus my question...
----- Original Message -----
From: L. Aaron Kaplan
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RIP vs other routing protocols
On Sep 2, 2010, at 10:16 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
I appreciate advice in many cases, but for this one, I have only heard one
answer to the question... That is: Is RIP stable? That person that answered
said "Yes".
Sure, if you want to have stable routing loops :))
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
