I'm not sure how many of your are on the NANOG list, but there's a very interesting thread going on about RIP vs other routing protocols. Figured some people may want to read this.
http://www.mail-archive.com/na...@nanog.org/msg26990.html -- Blake Covarrubias On Sep 2, 2010, at 11:21 PM, RickG wrote: > One of the best network engineers I've ever met, who was a owner/operator of > a fairly large, local ISP and currently owns/operates a fairly large > datacenter, helped me with some initial issues I had in our expanding > network. 3 years ago, he suggested I switch from zero routing protocol to > RIP. I feel it was one of the best things I ever did. Very solid, zero > issues. I too have considered a newer protocol but have found no compelling > reason to do so. Maybe when we grow up :) > -RickG > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Mark Nash - Lists <markl...@uwol.net> wrote: > We ran into a problem yesterday that caused a large problem, and I'm now > quite sure that it was assessed properly, as our network engineer blamed it > on RIP not working properly and made the decision to implement BGP for > routing at this site. Everywhere else, we're using RIP. > > Essentially, we had to move from one tower to another on the same > mountaintop. So we bought all new equipment and finished its installation > yesterday. 9 APs and 2 backhauls. > > Using Mikrotik ethernet routers... > > Now, I'm now sure of the specifics of the problem, and I'm not really > interested in asking you all to troubleshoot the problem that we had > yesterday. > > My question is this... > > Is RIP solid? It's been around for decades, and I used it extensively in the > beginning years when I was doing everything. But it seems that we have many > problems lately and RIP is being blamed for it. It's a very easy protocol to > administer & configure, not too complicated, so I can't imagine so many > problems when things are properly configured. > > I know there are better protocols to use on wireless networks these days, and > that there are protocols to use that allow failover to redundant backhauls, > etc. That is not my question. > > When properly configured...Is RIP solid? We have about 900 customers and > about 20 tower sites. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
