At 12/20/2010 08:36 PM, MDK wrote:
>I am opposed to ALL aspects, period.   Nothing is broken such that it needs
>the atomic bomb of government to fix it.
>
>This is a fix in desperate search of a "broken" and the closest thing to a
>"broken" they can find is a hypothetical that isn't a disaster in the first
>place.

Well, no, what IS PROFOUNDLY BROKEN is that the ILECs are no longer 
required to be common carriers.  They built their network using 
common carrier privileges.  They got their market share using common 
carrier privileges.  And then they turned  around and got their 
common carrier obligations lifted by the profoundly corrupt 
Cheney-Rove FCC.  So now they control the content on their wires, and 
you can't lease them.  That's just wrong.  And the Genachowski FCC 
isn't doing squat about that, though they absolutely have the power 
to do so.  We do need a national common carrier utility.  There is a 
clear distinction between carriage and content. ISPs are content, not 
carriage.  And WISPs are self-provisioned ISPs who deliver content 
over unlicensed facilities without using a carrier, and without being one.


  --
  Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
  ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to