I'd have to agree with Mark.  Its my network, my money.  Get the hell 
out. When I accept government money or protections, sure, tell me what 
to do.  Otherwise...

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/20/2010 8:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>    'Dude'... get a grip.. get out of this business, get some sanity into
> your life... this kind of stress is not good...
>
> Just imagine how Alexander Graham Bell felt when the Gov. decided to
> regulate the Phone Company !
>
> Fact of life... when a service starts to become a crucial / critical for
> the general population... the Gov. (anywhere in the world) will start to
> regulate it...
>
> Don't be surprised if tomorrow's Internet, gets to be like a utility !
> (Electricity ?) ...
>
> Get a grip, you don't have to like the rules, but realize you are not in
> position to make the rules, just play by them...or not !
>
> Don't like it.. go do something else... Throwing tantrums will not make
> a difference...
>
> :)
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet&   Telecom
>
> On 12/20/2010 8:36 PM, MDK wrote:
>> I am opposed to ALL aspects, period.   Nothing is broken such that it needs
>> the atomic bomb of government to fix it.
>>
>> This is a fix in desperate search of a "broken" and the closest thing to a
>> "broken" they can find is a hypothetical that isn't a disaster in the first
>> place.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
>> 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Jeromie Reeves"<jree...@18-30chat.net>
>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:56 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List"<wireless@wispa.org>
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
>>
>>> While I do agree with the idea that we need less regulation of (fixed)
>>> wireless and a lower barrier to entry for cellular wireless, I would
>>> like to knwo what parts of this particular proposal you have a issue
>>> with. I, personally, would love to see the layer 1 and layer 2+ be
>>> forcably broken apart for wired isps (IE, if you are a ILEC, you must
>>> have a separate business entity run the 2+, with set prices for
>>> everyone who wants to be a layer 2+ entity on that layer 1 network)
>>> with wireless getting a mix of this (unlicensed is not bound to layer
>>> 1/2+ split, with some licensed being (like cellular) and some licensed
>>> not being bound (like 3.65, sub 700) and opening more spectrum (that
>>> is a mix of bound and non-bound) and see where that takes us. Time to
>>> wake up and go pickup the kids.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:30 PM, MDK<rea...@muddyfrogwater.us>   wrote:
>>>> No, we LOST.   You see, once they have the power, they have the power.
>>>> It
>>>> is not a victory to be partially regulated, or to get "partial
>>>> exemption".
>>>>
>>>> I cannot imagine why industry is rolling over and playing dead for this.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I’m concerned it's "come and arrest me, coppers" and I will
>>>> damn
>>>> well NOT comply.
>>>>
>>>> And if we all did that.  They'd just give up.   But we're too chicken to
>>>> stand up for ourselves, as a country, anymore, apparently.   I don't know
>>>> when people forgot that according to the Constitution, we tell the
>>>> government what to do and where to get off, not the other way around.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
>>>> 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> From: Joe Fiero
>>>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:12 PM
>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
>>>>
>>>> It’s good to see all our efforts pay off.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> REUTERS  updated 2 minutes ago 2010-12-20T21:45:55
>>>>
>>>> WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission is expected to adopt
>>>> Internet traffic rules on Tuesday that would ban the blocking of lawful
>>>> content, but allow high-speed Internet providers to manage their
>>>> networks,
>>>> senior agency officials said Monday.
>>>>
>>>> Commissioners Michael Copps and Mignon Clyburn had expressed concerns
>>>> with
>>>> the proposal laid out by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski early this
>>>> month,
>>>> but senior FCC officials said they had come to an agreement and are
>>>> expected
>>>> to vote in favor of the rules.
>>>>
>>>> Genachowski proposed banning the blocking of lawful traffic but allowing
>>>> Internet providers to manage network congestion and charge consumers
>>>> based
>>>> on Internet usage.
>>>>
>>>> The rules would be more flexible for wireless broadband, Genachowski said
>>>> in
>>>> a previous speech, acknowledging that wireless is at an earlier stage of
>>>> development than terrestrial Internet service.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to