Nothing personal here...

I have yet to see some 'constructive' discussion from Mark about how to influence the outcome of such regulations... I am not in favor of the regulation... but ours would not be the first Independent Business to be 'Regulated' in some form or another.. (Food business is regulated, Medial Business is regulated, Fuel Business is regulated etc. etc. etc..)

On one side when larger companies in an industry start to flex their muscles, and start playing arrogant, that simply invites Regulation... but then again we all behave similar in our own play pens as well... but it is just that we are small and thus don't hit the regulators radar screen..

You have to actively Participate in the rule making process, otherwise live be the rules made by others. A boycott, or total anti gov. attitude is simply going to increase your stress level and accomplish nothing.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet&  Telecom

On 12/21/2010 12:42 AM, RickG wrote:
Faisal, with all due respect, (and you know I do) - Mark is right. We are not phone companys. We are PRIVATE, independent companys with volunteer subscribers. Are you saying we have already lost? The fact that we are even having to have this conversation in "the land of the free" is sad. BTW: I dont read Mark's post as a tantrum. It's hard for anyone to comment on negative news in a positive light. P.S. It looks like Bell fared well against governmetn lawsuits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Graham_Bell

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappydsl.net <mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net>> wrote:

     'Dude'... get a grip.. get out of this business, get some sanity into
    your life... this kind of stress is not good...

    Just imagine how Alexander Graham Bell felt when the Gov. decided to
    regulate the Phone Company !

    Fact of life... when a service starts to become a crucial /
    critical for
    the general population... the Gov. (anywhere in the world) will
    start to
    regulate it...

    Don't be surprised if tomorrow's Internet, gets to be like a utility !
    (Electricity ?) ...

    Get a grip, you don't have to like the rules, but realize you are
    not in
    position to make the rules, just play by them...or not !

    Don't like it.. go do something else... Throwing tantrums will not
    make
    a difference...

    :)


    Faisal Imtiaz
    Snappy Internet&  Telecom

    On 12/20/2010 8:36 PM, MDK wrote:
    > I am opposed to ALL aspects, period.   Nothing is broken such
    that it needs
    > the atomic bomb of government to fix it.
    >
    > This is a fix in desperate search of a "broken" and the closest
    thing to a
    > "broken" they can find is a hypothetical that isn't a disaster
    in the first
    > place.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    > Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
    > 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
    > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------
    > From: "Jeromie Reeves"<jree...@18-30chat.net
    <mailto:jree...@18-30chat.net>>
    > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:56 PM
    > To: "WISPA General List"<wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
    > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
    >
    >> While I do agree with the idea that we need less regulation of
    (fixed)
    >> wireless and a lower barrier to entry for cellular wireless, I
    would
    >> like to knwo what parts of this particular proposal you have a
    issue
    >> with. I, personally, would love to see the layer 1 and layer 2+ be
    >> forcably broken apart for wired isps (IE, if you are a ILEC,
    you must
    >> have a separate business entity run the 2+, with set prices for
    >> everyone who wants to be a layer 2+ entity on that layer 1 network)
    >> with wireless getting a mix of this (unlicensed is not bound to
    layer
    >> 1/2+ split, with some licensed being (like cellular) and some
    licensed
    >> not being bound (like 3.65, sub 700) and opening more spectrum
    (that
    >> is a mix of bound and non-bound) and see where that takes us.
    Time to
    >> wake up and go pickup the kids.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:30 PM, MDK<rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
    <mailto:rea...@muddyfrogwater.us>>  wrote:
    >>> No, we LOST.   You see, once they have the power, they have
    the power.
    >>> It
    >>> is not a victory to be partially regulated, or to get "partial
    >>> exemption".
    >>>
    >>> I cannot imagine why industry is rolling over and playing dead
    for this.
    >>>
    >>> As far as I’m concerned it's "come and arrest me, coppers" and
    I will
    >>> damn
    >>> well NOT comply.
    >>>
    >>> And if we all did that.  They'd just give up.   But we're too
    chicken to
    >>> stand up for ourselves, as a country, anymore, apparently.   I
    don't know
    >>> when people forgot that according to the Constitution, we tell the
    >>> government what to do and where to get off, not the other way
    around.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    >>> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
    >>> 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
    >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    >>> From: Joe Fiero
    >>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:12 PM
    >>> To: 'WISPA General List'
    >>> Subject: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
    >>>
    >>> It’s good to see all our efforts pay off.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> REUTERS  updated 2 minutes ago 2010-12-20T21:45:55
    >>>
    >>> WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission is expected
    to adopt
    >>> Internet traffic rules on Tuesday that would ban the blocking
    of lawful
    >>> content, but allow high-speed Internet providers to manage their
    >>> networks,
    >>> senior agency officials said Monday.
    >>>
    >>> Commissioners Michael Copps and Mignon Clyburn had expressed
    concerns
    >>> with
    >>> the proposal laid out by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski early
    this
    >>> month,
    >>> but senior FCC officials said they had come to an agreement
    and are
    >>> expected
    >>> to vote in favor of the rules.
    >>>
    >>> Genachowski proposed banning the blocking of lawful traffic
    but allowing
    >>> Internet providers to manage network congestion and charge
    consumers
    >>> based
    >>> on Internet usage.
    >>>
    >>> The rules would be more flexible for wireless broadband,
    Genachowski said
    >>> in
    >>> a previous speech, acknowledging that wireless is at an
    earlier stage of
    >>> development than terrestrial Internet service.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ________________________________
    >>>
    >>>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
    >>>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>
    >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
    >>>
    >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    >>>
    >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
    >>>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>
    >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
    >>>
    >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    >>>
    >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    >> http://signup.wispa.org/
    >>
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>
    >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
    >>
    >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    >>
    >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    >
    >
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    > http://signup.wispa.org/
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
    >
    > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    >
    > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    >



    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    http://signup.wispa.org/
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

    Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--
-RickG




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to