Ubnt 900 apparently has extremely poor nlos for 900 MHz. I've heard this a handful of people but haven't tried it myself.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote: > How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz > system was junk had a poor RF environment. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ________________________________ > From: "Erik Anderson" <erik.ander...@hocking.net> > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas > > 98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their other > products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is better. > Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these > technologies have very low bandwidth. > > On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: > > What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used both > Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just put > up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards the > UBNT solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really satisfied > with. > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
