Almost every time someone has detailed their installations to me, there just 
isn't enough signal to do anything. They're getting a -76 and wondering why it 
doesn't work. Increase that another 15 dB and try again. The Canopy will work a 
little better because it requires less signal, but it also has nowhere near the 
same throughput, so they're really apples and oranges. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:20:24 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas 

Ubnt 900 apparently has extremely poor nlos for 900 MHz. I've heard 
this a handful of people but haven't tried it myself. 

Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> 
wrote: 
> How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz 
> system was junk had a poor RF environment. 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> ________________________________ 
> From: "Erik Anderson" <erik.ander...@hocking.net> 
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM 
> 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas 
> 
> 98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their other 
> products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is better. 
> Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these 
> technologies have very low bandwidth. 
> 
> On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: 
> 
> What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used both 
> Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just put 
> up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards the 
> UBNT solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really satisfied 
> with. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to