If you run TCP from a machine that has enough CPU they are very accurate. On Nov 12, 2013, at 13:50, Sam <w...@csilogan.com> wrote:
> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the > reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment. > For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no > connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf results, a > determination was made regarding maximum concurrent users per AP and > maximum aggregate bandwidth capacity of the radio. For the maximum > concurrent users I believe they tested this at several different > download and upload speed for the fictional users. > > Having never used iPerf, I don't know if the results from their tests > (which were very poor by the way - much lower than common configurations > of DL/UL rates as well as number of users per AP I've read many of you > describing on these lists) map reasonably to what one would expect from > a given AP, or if they tend to be wonky. > > Thanks, > Sam > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
