Careful using FTP as, particularly on fast links, you may find yourself 
measuring disk IO instead.

For downstream TCP measurements, wget -O /dev/null http://blah is a 
good way of preventing the disk becoming a bottleneck (at least on the 
receiving side).



On 13.11.2013 06:53, Bret Clark wrote:
> I've used it on a PI and found it to be very accurate.  Next to
> Iperf, put/get files from an FTP server provides good throughput
> measurements.
>
>  On 11/12/2013 02:49 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
>> Is it accurate using it on a Raspberry-pi? I was loading up my first 
>> one today to try out Iperf. Since someone on this thread mentioned 
>> 'CPU', I was wondering if that would be an issue on a PI? Clocked at 
>> 800Mhz..
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Hammett 
>> <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>
>>> iPerf is very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from 
>>> those conclusions may or may not be accurate.
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com [1]
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> FROM: "Sam" <w...@csilogan.com>
>>> TO: wireless@wispa.org
>>> SENT: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM
>>> SUBJECT: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
>>>
>>> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to 
>>> the
>>> reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world 
>>> environment.
>>> For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no
>>> connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf 
>>> results, a
>>> determination was made regarding maximum concurrent users per AP 
>>> and
>>> maximum aggregate bandwidth capacity of the radio. For the maximum
>>> concurrent users I believe they tested this at several different
>>> download and upload speed for the fictional users.
>>>
>>> Having never used iPerf, I don't know if the results from their 
>>> tests
>>> (which were very poor by the way - much lower than common 
>>> configurations
>>> of DL/UL rates as well as number of users per AP I've read many of 
>>> you
>>> describing on these lists) map reasonably to what one would expect 
>>> from
>>> a given AP, or if they tend to be wonky.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless [2]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless [2]
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>> SCS    
>>   Clay Stewart
>>   CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc.,
>>   DBA Stewart Computer Services  
>>   434.263.6363 O
>>   434.942.6510 C
>>   cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com 
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>            Wireless Broadband
>>            Programming
>>           Network Services
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.ics-il.com
> [2] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to