Use jperf for simplicity sake ☺ -Tim
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:35 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool iPerf is very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from those conclusions may or may not be accurate. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Sam" <w...@csilogan.com<mailto:w...@csilogan.com>> To: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM Subject: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment. For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf results, a determination was made regarding maximum concurrent users per AP and maximum aggregate bandwidth capacity of the radio. For the maximum concurrent users I believe they tested this at several different download and upload speed for the fictional users. Having never used iPerf, I don't know if the results from their tests (which were very poor by the way - much lower than common configurations of DL/UL rates as well as number of users per AP I've read many of you describing on these lists) map reasonably to what one would expect from a given AP, or if they tend to be wonky. Thanks, Sam _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
