Don't use cheap chipsets on the laptop. Who shipped the laptops you had problems with?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 12, 2013 9:09 PM, "Bob Moldashel" <lakel...@gbcx.net> wrote: > We have seen download/upload irregularities when using it with different > types of laptops/processors. Overall it is a good tool. > > Something to check first is to test laptop to laptop with a cossover cable > and see what your results are first. Nothing like chasing a problem that > isn't there. > > -B- > > > > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Bret Clark <bcl...@spectraaccess.com> wrote: > > I've used it on a PI and found it to be very accurate. Next to Iperf, > put/get files from an FTP server provides good throughput measurements. > > On 11/12/2013 02:49 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: > > Is it accurate using it on a Raspberry-pi? I was loading up my first one > today to try out Iperf. Since someone on this thread mentioned 'CPU', I was > wondering if that would be an issue on a PI? Clocked at 800Mhz.. > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net>wrote: > >> iPerf is very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from those >> conclusions may or may not be accurate. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Sam" <w...@csilogan.com> >> *To: *wireless@wispa.org >> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM >> *Subject: *[WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool >> >> >> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the >> reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment. >> For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no >> connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf results, a >> determination was made regarding maximum concurrent users per AP and >> maximum aggregate bandwidth capacity of the radio. For the maximum >> concurrent users I believe they tested this at several different >> download and upload speed for the fictional users. >> >> Having never used iPerf, I don't know if the results from their tests >> (which were very poor by the way - much lower than common configurations >> of DL/UL rates as well as number of users per AP I've read many of you >> describing on these lists) map reasonably to what one would expect from >> a given AP, or if they tend to be wonky. >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > > -- > > > -- > SCS > Clay Stewart > CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., > DBA Stewart Computer Services > 434.263.6363 O > 434.942.6510 C > cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com > “We Keep You Up and Running” > Wireless Broadband > Programming > Network Services > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
