On 07/02/12 16:26, Martin Dietze wrote: > On Tue, February 07, 2012, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: > >> Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria >> >> http://geek.net/terms-of-use#ProhibitedPersons >> >>> If that is a blocker (I can't comment on that without more >>> information), maybe there's another good open source hoster >>> around with bug tracker integration? I still think that SF is a >>> good choice.. >> >> No problem for me. > > I admit I don't like getting involved in this kind of thing. But
Me too. I don't have problems with the current git, and I only request a BTS because I think is better for us. But I don't have time to maintain a BTS, webpage or git. Other option is update a text file in the git, BUGS file? :-) > from a pragmatical point of view, as long as we don't have > developers from those countries we can still provide most > contents to anyone through the web site. > > As long as there is no usable alternative with the same > advantages but without those blacklists, I'd still vote yes for > SF. > > Cheers, > > M'bert > -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
