On Tue, February 07, 2012, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: > Me too. I don't have problems with the current git, and I only request a > BTS because I think is better for us. But I don't have time to maintain > a BTS, webpage or git.
Well, having used SF for a couple of my projects for years now I'd say that there is not much to maintain. The git is just as git is, i.e. there's no additional maintenance effort involved with that. The BTS is something we may want. If that is the case, it's supposed to save us time. I'm used to working with BTS, and I like it better than maintaining BUGS files :) With TRAC we'd also get a Wiki which integrates nicely with the BTS and - once this is available - with the code in the git. I used to work with it for several years while still in my last company, and I really like it a great deal, it's simple and helps developers organise. I'm probably the one here who has contributed the least from all of us here. Therefore I don't really want to convince people if they feel differently. But as the question was raised, that's what I think about it :) Cheers, M'bert -- ----------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / ------------- =+= Ich trink kein Wasser. Da ficken Fische drin... -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
