I'd recommend SourceForge, I use it for all my projects and they have everything freely available for Open Source projects.
However, preventing access to those countries isn't much of a big problem. You can just host the git mirror somewhere else, or someone could just push them the git mirror anyway. On 2/7/12, Martin Dietze <d...@fh-wedel.de> wrote: > On Tue, February 07, 2012, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: > >> Me too. I don't have problems with the current git, and I only request a >> BTS because I think is better for us. But I don't have time to maintain >> a BTS, webpage or git. > > Well, having used SF for a couple of my projects for years now > I'd say that there is not much to maintain. The git is just as > git is, i.e. there's no additional maintenance effort involved > with that. > > The BTS is something we may want. If that is the case, it's > supposed to save us time. I'm used to working with BTS, and I > like it better than maintaining BUGS files :) > > With TRAC we'd also get a Wiki which integrates nicely with the > BTS and - once this is available - with the code in the git. I > used to work with it for several years while still in my last > company, and I really like it a great deal, it's simple and > helps developers organise. > > I'm probably the one here who has contributed the least from all > of us here. Therefore I don't really want to convince people if > they feel differently. But as the question was raised, that's > what I think about it :) > > Cheers, > > M'bert > > -- > ----------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / ------------- > =+= > Ich trink kein Wasser. Da ficken Fische drin... > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org. > -- Yeah... -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
