El 28/01/2013 11:33, BALATON Zoltan escribió:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
Zoltan, test it!! :-) All should continue ok. Please, try it, you
have a lot of knowledge about this.
I don't have time for that but I gave you the procedure to test it
yourself. If it passes that I'm fine with it too.
I read the previous mail with Carlos, should I try to set the
textbox to "grey" or something like to avoid that the user could edit
it without set the checkbox?
Don't touch the textbox. I said the switch should be grey when
there's nothing in the textbox. Then the warning is not needed.
I was thinking about that, I made some tests, I am not happy.
Explanation:
Currently the icon path textbox could be filled using the pushbutton
"Browse..." to select the icon or just editing it. Using the pushbutton
is nice, because it calls "showIconFor()" to test if the icon exists.
But filling the textbox by hand is different. We cannot check if the
textbox has a valid icon or not, so we cannot set the switch enabled or
not. We can check if the textbox has a right value when we click on
apply or save, but not before. We can check it when we click on the
switch, but if the textbox is changed later, we could get a bad icon in
the textbox and the switch enable.
I don't know what to do. We can use the idea of set the textbox as non
editable and use only the "Browse..." button to set it, but I am not
sure about it.
Un saludo,
kix
--
||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
