On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 at 15:55:06 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 at 18:37:08 +0200, Christophe wrote: > > ----- Carlos R. Mafra <crma...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 at 12:05:42 +0200, Christophe wrote: > > > > ----- Josip Deanovic <djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > Further more, one cannot read the list of prerequisites as the file > > > > > INSTALL-WMAKER gets built only after you already have some of them > > > > > met e.g. autoconf, automake, possibly more. > > > > > > > > Yes, that is a known limit of the procedure in place. Actually this > > > > file is more meant for people compiling from the official package, > > > > which do not have these problems. The goal is for people compiling from > > > > Git to find this information online on the Website, which is an ongoing > > > > task. > > > > > > Sorry, this makes no sense. > > > > > > The INSTALL-WMAKER file should be a plain text for people to read without > > > any hassle. It should contain information to help people install > > > wmaker. Its existence cannot depend on things that the file is meant to > > > warn about in the first place. > > > > > > Can we get the file back like it was? > > > > It is not exactly "like it was", if you see what I mean ;-) > > > > Please note that when you change the version number for the next > > release, 'make' will regenerate the file for you with updated version > > information that you will probably want to include in the same > > version-change commit... > > Oh, no. Definitely no. I won't include the version change in the commit, > because this is not supposed to happen.
I reverted the last patch so that this won't happen. Sorry for the noise and making you do extra work with the last patch. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
