It's great to see such a large site being discussed openly on the list.
Other than what has been discussed, the only I thing I can see is the markup:
<p class="standardsNote">
<strong>Note:</strong> You are reading this message either because you can not see our css files, or because you do not have a standards-compliant browser. Read our <a href="http://www.f2.com.au/browserstandards/";>browser standards page</a> for details or a text based version of this site is <a href="www.theage.com.au/text/index.html">available here</a>.
</p>
That will be visible to your search engines... it would be better to put this behind a "help" link on the site.
Cheers James
Tim Lucas wrote:
Peter Ottery spoke the following wise words on 20/04/2004 10:27 AM EST:*****************************************************
hiya, we relaunched theage.com.au today with improved markup and a css layout. http://theage.com.au/
Peter, once again my hat goes off to the f2 team.
One interesting choice , I noticed, was in the print style sheet where you've set a 600px width for #content. Shouldn't you be letting the UA set it's own margins for printing?
Also, have you considered including a rule in the print stylesheet for those using CSS3 capable browsers to print the URL of links?
-- tim lucas
www.toolmantim.com
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
