I have an IC-7300 and I can confirm that VFO-B does not change on band
change until TX

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:10 PM Paul Kube <paul.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> "  perhaps there should be a note in the User Manual that, at least
> for Icom rigs, the 'Fake It' split mode is preferred/recommended?"
>
> "Rig" mode works fine with my IC-7200 and IC-7300.
>
> 73, Paul K6PO
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:45 PM Martin Davies G0HDB <marting0...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4 Mar 2019 at 4:51, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
>>
>> > Both conditions need to fixed.  VFO-A needs to be set as selected VFO
>> > and VFO-B set to the split freq at all times.  Otherwise a tune
>> > instigated from an external source will be on the wrong frequency.And
>> > yes...I know you can click Tune in WSJT-X and then VFO-B gets
>> > set...but that leaves the amplifier in-line with too much power to
>> > tune and for some could fry the amplifier.
>> > Mike
>>
>> Hi Mike (and all), for what it's worth I've found that using the 'Fake
>> It' split mode, rather than
>> the 'Rig' mode, works best with my Icom IC-7600.
>>
>> Some years ago, when I first tried using the 'Rig' mode with WSJT I found
>> that the time taken
>> to switch VFOs (from A to B in my case) and then to re-tune the
>> newly-selected VFO with the
>> desired offset (eg. +1kHz) was significantly longer than just re-tuning
>> the active VFO,
>> presumably because there was a longer command sequence to be received,
>> processed and
>> then actioned by the rig.  The delay in the rig switching VFOs and then
>> re-tuning was
>> resulting in the transmission not starting until (IIRC) some 2-3secs into
>> a Tx period.
>>
>> I would assume that using the 'Fake It' mode would work equally well
>> irrespective of which
>> VFO was the active one, so perhaps there should be a note in the User
>> Manual that, at least
>> for Icom rigs, the 'Fake It' split mode is preferred/recommended?
>>
>> --
>> 73, Martin G0HDB
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to