I don't think it is an AWTA. There are a number of things we have done at AWTA that we aren't planning to do this time.
1. AWTA is by invitation only. Applicants must apply. They are not added to the mailing list until they have been accepted. 2. AWTA makes no distinction between presenters and attendees. Same application and fees for all. 3. AWTA has been limited to 25 people. 4. AWTA has never had sponsors. I'm happy to discuss relaxing these rules, but that conversation needs to happen on the AWTA list (by those of you have been to AWTA before). I agree, it does need a name. Bret On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Željko Filipin < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Alister Scott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I will create a Google Group to plan the event as soon as we have a name. > > Do we need another group? We could use [email protected]: > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/awta/ > > Željko > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -- Bret Pettichord Director, Watir Project, www.watir.com Blog, www.testingwithvision.com Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
