David Dawes writes: > > But we do say that (in an auto-reply), as I've said at least twice already.
I only saw your second answer after writing the message that lead to this. > I don't think the following sequence is unreasonable: > > 1. user posts to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2. user gets auto-reply about subscribing > 3. user chooses to subscribe (or not) > 4. user sees replies to their question (or not) > I don't deny that the idea to lurke more potential future supporters to this list has its merits. However do we have any idea how many people actually subscribe and see the answers and how many answers are just written for the trash? If the majority of our answers don't reach their desination we should definitely think about a different support concept. Egbert. _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
