<praise> I agree with your comments about selling features. But have you noticed that you aren't selling it (marketing), most people see Xmail for what it is and recommend it. With the Filter architecture, you shouldn't need to add features a go-go. Third party filter writers can do that.
</praise> <feed-back&soapbox> I think that as much as you probably don't like documentation, that is the next area that needs tidying up a little. It is adequate but not great. Unfortunatley that is evidenced by the numerous emails asking the same thing. And while I'm at it, telling some one asking about documentation improvements, to 'go update it yourself' is not the right way to respond to these emails. </feed-back&soapbox> Rob :-) __________________________________________________________ Censorship can't eliminate evil; it can only kill freedom. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2003 8:49 AM > To: XMail mailing list > Subject: [xmail] Re: feature request > > > > On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Are you the only programmer that works on this? > > Yep, and believe it is good like this. I sure do not want XMail to become > like Exchange by keeping adding features a go-go. See, the good of free > software is that you do *not* have to sell anything. You do *not* have to > push features to sell version X.Y. > > > > - Davide > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
