On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, smf wrote: > The biggest problem with moving to modules is that you can't guarantee that > they would be compatible between versions. Paging is reasonably effective at > reducing the amount of physical memory required, but if you have a specific > requirement then you can compile a version that supports only the cpus/games > etc you want.
Huh. I assumed anyone would distribute xmame as a whole, not pieces and parts of it. It's only when you upgrade pieces and parts of an application and its shared libraries that you run into compatibility problems. In any case you could implement a versioning system if you really believe it would be a problem. It's still simple to do. -Dan _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
