Hi all - I have reasonable amount of success now, and have resolution on 118 as 
good as on 111b. 

In summary: 
1. On nv111b I specified radeon as the device driver, and got 1680x1050. If I 
didn't provide an xorg.conf, the monitor would display 'out of range' on an 
otherwise blank screen.

2. On nv117/118 I got the same result. My mistake was to give up on radeon 
device driver too soon and fall back to vesa, which does not provide either the 
desired 1920x1080 or the previously used 1680x1050, so I got the lower 
resolution I described in opening post of this thread.

3. I added a ModeLine for 1680x1050, and that worked. Note that I did NOT have 
a 1680x1050 ModeLine or Mode in the 111b version of xorg.conf. 

4 .ModeLines for 1920x1080 were ineffective: Xorg.0.log has 1680x1050 listed 
among the "Supported Future Video Modes", but 1920x1080 is not: it shows up in 
reported device settings (eg: h_active: 1920  h_sync: 2008  h_sync_end 2052 
h_blank_end 2200 h_border: 0), and as a generated Modeline:
(II) RADEON(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
(II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x59.9  138.50  1920 1968 2000 2080  1080 
1083 1088 1111 +hsync -vsync (66.6 kHz)

But if you try to use that modeline, or if you use the Screen Resolution applet 
(right click on empty part of desktop, select Screen Resolution, select 
resolution 1920x1080) then you get back to the blank screen and "Out Of Range" 
displayed.  

Ideally, I'd have the full pixel range supported by the video card and monitor 
- Windows supports it, so I know it can display at this resolution, but the 
resulting resolution is more than adequate.  I hope that the radeon driver is 
updated at some point to permit this. I also suggest that it is somewhat 
misleading to display modelines in Xorg.0.log for resolutions that the driver 
does not actually support.

The advice I got here was invaluable in getting the display to be acceptable 
again. Thanks to all!

regards, Jeff
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to