> Ken, aren't you shooting a bit over the top here? If you had filed this > "bug" half a year or so ago for 7.3, then maybe.
And not even this, because 7.3 was not really a "release", but rather a snapshot of patchwork. It would not have been justified (given the few new features) to port all all all the patches to 7.3, basicly for almost nothing. Really. Do you thing a higher rev. of something is necessarily always the better choice? rgds.
