-----Original Message----- From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 April 2006 02:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: coding standard and logging
Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/4/2006 4:05 PM: > Nolan, Edell wrote: > >> 2) The last email for the logging - is below We could use the >> LogUtils class from celtix which is using the jdk1.5 logging. > > > I think there was strong opposition against JDK logging because people > love log4j. I think the consensus was to define our own logger > interface and inject that in ORB.init(). What are our target JDK versions again? Do we start w/ JDK14 or JDK13? I am of the opinion that we use the vanilla logger for JDK14 or, if we start w/ JDK13, log4j. In either case I do not see the need for a specialized logger interface that's injected; I'm interested in hearing opinion on this. ==> Is there a reason why we can't start with jdk1.5 ? Looking towards the future Geronimo will be moving to jdk1.5 right ? ==> I also think that if we go with jdk1.5 -we should be using the jdk logging (Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't geronimo use "commons logging" and moving towards jdk1.5 this might make more sense. Thoughts ? Cheers, Edell. >> Look at the logging and i18n >> http://svn.forge.objectweb.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/celtix/trunk/celti >> x-common/src/main/java/org/objectweb/celtix/common/ >> >> >> or put these in yoko > > > Is i18n of log messages really a requirement for you? If not, I'd like > to avoid that for now... I don't see a need to i18n the logger either but then again, I'm an American. Regards, Alan
