Mike,

As I say, We all have attachments but I'm not attached to my attachments. They 
arise and I let them pass without following them...

Edgar



On Sep 13, 2012, at 9:56 AM, mike brown wrote:

> Edgar,
> 
> Yes, the dust is illusionary, but it still 'exists' and affects us in the 
> same way as desires/attachments etc do. This why I said, "I'm still largely a 
> prisoner of conditions, even though I intuitively know that these conditions 
> are illusionary". And so I continue to wipe, and if we're being truthful, so 
> do most of us here, I suspect.
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2012, 13:32
> Subject: Re: [Zen] the real world and zen power
> 
> 
>   
> Mike,
> 
> This is a misunderstanding of Hui Neng's poem...
> 
> It's not that the dust has nowhere to settle but that the dust itself is 
> DUSTLESS...
> 
> Meaning that everything in reality is a manifestations of Buddha Nature, even 
> dust.
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:08 AM, mike brown wrote:
> 
>   
>> 
>> 
>> Chris,
>> 
>> 
>>> because this is the crux; why do we practice when everything is complete as 
>>> it is
>> 
>> 
>> I often ask myself the same thing. Hui-eng's poem was accepted by his master 
>> because he spoke of there being no mirror to polish so there is no where for 
>> the dust to settle. Yet Buddha spoke about people having different amounts 
>> of dust in their eyes. It's not really an either/or argument (I don't want 
>> to end up as a fox for 500 rebirths!). One speaks of ultimate truth - the 
>> other a conventional truth. I'm still largely a prisoner of conditions, even 
>> though I intuitively know that these conditions are illusionary. But to 
>> "just drop them", as so many people here are want to say, is rather easier 
>> to say than actually do. So I keep polishing, because even though mirror 
>> may, or may not, exist - I know that the dust does. [insert ironic 
>> statements here ; )].
>> 
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: ChrisAustinLane <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2012, 0:38
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] the real world and zen power
>> 
>> 
>>   
>> I must second this. I have saved an email from you Mike where in you ask 
>> some tormenter if they do not find the world a bit cleaner after a sesshin 
>> (part of the endless words on polishing vs. ceasing). I have not replied 
>> because this is the crux; why do we practice when everything is complete as 
>> it is. Too funny but still. 
>> 
>> 
>> I have the sort of live where I generally enjoy the retreat quite a lot, 
>> nothing as hard for me as semi-sincere and semi-aware parenting (alas that 
>> one must see one's flaws as a parent, the gap between preference and 
>> reality, in order to be a decent parent), but they definitely make things 
>> easier; if not by insight at least by spaciousness. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Chris Austin-Lane
>> Sent from a cell phone
>> 
>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 15:49, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Merle,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Have you never been on a retreat? It's a great way to be free of the day to 
>>> day distractions which prevent us from going really deep within ourselves. 
>>> It's certainly not an escape from the world and can be one of the most 
>>> difficult and challenging times we can experience. But the insights we can 
>>> get from it, which might not be possible with our busy schedules, help us 
>>> to deal with the stuff everyday life throws at us. Don't knock it til you 
>>> try it! : )
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Merle Lester <[email protected]>
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 23:07
>>> Subject: [Zen] the real world and zen power
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  ..if you sit around meditating all day...just as some folk in other 
>>> religions pray/ chant all day then "nothing " is happening to upset the 
>>> apple cart so to speak.... going out in the real world...facing it...that's 
>>> when the "trouble " starts...that's when you need the "tools of survival" 
>>> to get through the day..
>>> .reality dawns 
>>> and reality can be a" bag of allsorts" as you all well know
>>> that's when you need the" zen power" to get you through the day!
>>> merle
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>>> JM,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Serious practitioners were asked to sit at least one hour without moving.  
>>>> Mark Troxell, the one recently was transmitted with Buddha Heart Imprint 
>>>> was told to meditate FOUR hours a day, I was told.  Yak..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just out of interest, here's a schedule for a Vipassana retreat. 
>>> Compulsory/not compulsory just means that you can meditate in your own room 
>>> or in the main hall. You can see that there is a minimum of 10 hours a day 
>>> meditation over 10 days - ALL conducted in Noble silence with no reading or 
>>> writing material, music, books or cell phones etc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 4:00 – 04:30  Get Up & Take a Shower
>>> 04:30 – 06:30  Meditation in the Main Hall (not compulsory)
>>> 06:30 – 08:00  Breakfast & Rest
>>> 08:00 – 10:00  Group Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>>> 10:00 – 11:00  Meditation in Hall (usually compulsory)
>>> 11:00 – 13:00  Lunch & Rest
>>> 13:00 – 14:30  Meditation in Hall (not compulsory)
>>> 14:30 – 17:00  Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>>> 17:00 – 18:00  Tea-time
>>> 18:00 – 19:00  Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>>> 19:00 – 20:20  Goenka Discourse Video
>>> 20:30 – 21:00  Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>>> 21:00 – 22:00  Shower & Rest
>>> 22:00  Lights Out
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A pretty intense schedule, but a great opportunity be free of the usual 
>>> daily distractions in order to go deep into the mind.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: 覺妙精明 (JMJM) <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected] 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 7:15
>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: suffering
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>>> Let me add to this...  Surpass all comfort zone, all the knowledge, all the 
>>> basis, in short everything,  is the key to Chan.
>>> 
>>> Our minimum requirement is half lotus.  Most of the serious
>    practitioners do full lotus.  I do, because full lotus on the floor,
>    opens up all the meridians near the hip and the legs, so that our
>    body can be in tip top shape.
>>> 
>>> Serious practitioners were asked to sit at least one hour without
>    moving.  Mark Troxell, the one recently was transmitted with Buddha
>    Heart Imprint was told to meditate FOUR hours a day, I was told. 
>    Yak..
>>> 
>>> jm
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/11/2012 7:45 PM, mike brown wrote:
>>> 
>>>   
>>>> Bill!,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> There are many different reasons why practioners from different traditions 
>>>> sit on their cushions. In Vipassana, we stay with the discomfort to see 
>>>> into how and the body affects the mind. If we constantly rearrange our 
>>>> sitting position when we experience discomfort, we miss the opportunity to 
>>>> see how dukkha (dissatisfaction) operates. That's one of the great things 
>>>> about mindfulness - we can go deeply into phenomena to see the 3 
>>>> Characteristics (impermanence, dukkha, no-self) in operation. Sitting thru 
>>>> discomfort (dis-ease) is a great tool.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Bill! <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 2:37
>>>> Subject: [Zen] Re: suffering
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   
>>>> JMJM, et al...
>>>> 
>>>> My initial teachers encouraged me to switch
>                          legs, rock back and forth, stand up and walk
>                          around and even use different postures,
>                          (full-lotus, half-lotus, cross-legged,
>                          kneeling and even just sitting on a chair - as
>                          long as whatever posture I used allowed me to
>                          breathe freely and deeply. That requires at
>                          least an erect back to allow for 'belly
>                          breathing' (breathing by using the diaphragm
>                          instead of the chest or shoulders). Of course
>                          if we were sitting with a group we were
>                          encouraged not to change legs or do anything
>                          overt which might bother others. Our sitting
>                          sessions were usually 20-40 mins, then a 5-min
>                          break, and then another session. We would sit
>                          3 sessions like that.
>>>> 
>>>> ...Bill!
>>>> 
>>>> --- In [email protected], 覺妙精明 (JMJM) <chan.jmjm@...> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If I may add to this...
>>>>> 
>>>>> My teacher asks us "avoid switching legs
>                          during sitting..." In other 
>>>>> words, it is for training our mind to be
>                          detached from our physical 
>>>>> body. Because, the physical body is our
>                          first hindrance to 
>>>>> enlightenment. Then there is the
>                          hindrance of our mind and hindrance of 
>>>>> our spirit to surpass next... Not hard.
>                          Right? :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 9/11/2012 4:33 PM, mike brown wrote:
>>>>>> ED,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I can't talk about zazen, but in
>                          Vipassana, pain is something we're 
>>>>>> taught to welcome (within reason)
>                          because it's a good tool to teach us 
>>>>>> insight into impermanence, suffering
>                          and an impersonal self. I can 
>>>>>> honestly say that sitting without
>                          moving for an hour, or more, 
>>>>>> sometimes creates the most intense
>                          pain I have ever suffered in my 
>>>>>> life! The only time I've found that
>                          pain is completely alleviated is 
>>>>>> when I've entered into the jhanas.
>                          This is no exaggeration. I've gone 
>>>>>> from the most intense white-hot pain
>                          to the most ecstatic bliss in an 
>>>>>> instant. Of course, and here's the
>                          lesson, this state passes and the 
>>>>>> pain comes back once more. A
>                          valuable lesson in the arising and 
>>>>>> passing of phenomena that is way
>                          beyond just an intellectual 
>>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>                          
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> *From:* ED <seacrofter001@...>
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 September 2012,
>                          15:16
>>>>>> *Subject:* [Zen] Re: suffering
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bill! and Mike,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is it not the case that zazen or
>                          vipasana can also help alleviate pain?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --ED
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --- In [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>, 
>>>>>> "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Merle,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am also 66!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm about to give you some of
>                          my definitions of terms and they're
>>>>>> pretty 'tough-love' definitions so
>                          be warned...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Pain is NOT suffering. Pain is
>                          pain. Suffering is feeling sorry for
>>>>>> yourself (your self) because perhaps
>                          you're in pain and that does not
>>>>>> meet up with your expectations and
>                          disappoints you.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You do not have to suffer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The best example I know of this
>                          is a 3-legged dog. I'm sure you've
>>>>>> seen many of them. They aren't
>                          suffering because (I presume) they don't
>>>>>> have a strong 'mental model' of
>                          'self'. They don't feel sorry for
>>>>>> themselves. They don't compare
>                          themselves to other dogs. They just make
>>>>>> do with what they've got. I've seen
>                          dogs with only 2 legs and they don't
>>>>>> act any differently than those with
>                          4. You could be a little
>>>>>> condescending and say 'they don't
>                          know any better' - when actually you
>>>>>> should be just saying 'they don't
>                          know' - and good for them.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Contrast that with a human who
>                          has lost a leg. Many such humans will
>>>>>> suffer. They'll wonder 'why me'?
>                          'What did I do to deserve this?' And be
>>>>>> envious of full-bodied humans who
>                          can do more and have more than they.
>>>>>> Why? Because they DO have a strong
>                          'mental model' of 'self' and have
>>>>>> expectations of what life SHOULD be
>                          like, and do compare themselves with
>>>>>> others. Their life is not like
>                          others (the majority) and this
>>>>>> disappoints them so they suffer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Zazen can help...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...Bill!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to