yes. yes yes..edgar..how right you are....dust and cobwebs....merle

  
Bill,

That's why in this lifetime you will always be plagued by dust and consider it 
a nuisance, rather than realizing it's Buddha nature and enjoying it as a 
natural part of reality...

Edgar




On Sep 14, 2012, at 3:44 AM, billsmart wrote:

  
>Edgar,
>
>That's not my understanding of Hui Neng's poem.  My understanding (aka, 
>accommodate it in my default mental model)is:
>
>Dust is illusion - Maya.  The mirror is your discriminating, dualistic mind.  
>Dust clinging to the mirror is attachment.  The first monk's poem of 'keeping 
>the mirror clean' means continually severing attachments.  Hui Neng's poem 'no 
>mirror where dust can alight' means  realizing your discriminating, dualistic 
>mind is illusory - it's not really there.  Only Buddha Nature.
>
>...Bill!
>
>--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>> 
>> This is a misunderstanding of Hui Neng's poem...
>> 
>> It's not that the dust has nowhere to settle but that the dust itself is 
>> DUSTLESS...
>> 
>> Meaning that everything in reality is a manifestations of Buddha Nature, 
>> even dust.
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:08 AM, mike brown wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > Chris,
>> > 
>> > >because this is the crux; why do we practice when everything is complete 
>> > >as it is
>> > 
>> > I often ask myself the same thing. Hui-eng's poem was accepted by his 
>> > master because he spoke of there being no mirror to polish so there is no 
>> > where for the dust to settle. Yet Buddha spoke about people having 
>> > different amounts of dust in their eyes. It's not really an either/or 
>> > argument (I don't want to end up as a fox for 500 rebirths!). One speaks 
>> > of ultimate truth - the other a conventional truth. I'm still largely a 
>> > prisoner of conditions, even though I intuitively know that these 
>> > conditions are illusionary. But to "just drop them", as so many people 
>> > here are want to say, is rather easier to say than actually do. So I keep 
>> > polishing, because even though mirror may, or may not, exist - I know that 
>> > the dust does. [insert ironic statements here ; )].
>> > 
>> > Mike
>> > 
>> > From: ChrisAustinLane <chris@...>
>> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> > Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2012, 0:38
>> > Subject: Re: [Zen] the real world and zen power
>> > 
>> > 
>> > I must second this. I have saved an email from you Mike where in you ask 
>> > some tormenter if they do not find the world a bit cleaner after a sesshin 
>> > (part of the endless words on polishing vs. ceasing). I have not replied 
>> > because this is the crux; why do we practice when everything is complete 
>> > as it is. Too funny but still. 
>> > 
>> > I have the sort of live where I generally enjoy the retreat quite a lot, 
>> > nothing as hard for me as semi-sincere and semi-aware parenting (alas that 
>> > one must see one's flaws as a parent, the gap between preference and 
>> > reality, in order to be a decent parent), but they definitely make things 
>> > easier; if not by insight at least by spaciousness. 
>> > 
>> > Thanks,
>> > Chris Austin-Lane
>> > Sent from a cell phone
>> > 
>> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 15:49, mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Merle,
>> >> 
>> >> Have you never been on a retreat? It's a great way to be free of the day 
>> >> to day distractions which prevent us from going really deep within 
>> >> ourselves. It's certainly not an escape from the world and can be one of 
>> >> the most difficult and challenging times we can experience. But the 
>> >> insights we can get from it, which might not be possible with our busy 
>> >> schedules, help us to deal with the stuff everyday life throws at us. 
>> >> Don't knock it til you try it! : )
>> >> 
>> >> Mike
>> >> 
>> >> From: Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...>
>> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 23:07
>> >> Subject: [Zen] the real world and zen power
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >>  ..if you sit around meditating all day...just as some folk in other 
>> >> religions pray/ chant all day then "nothing " is happening to upset the 
>> >> apple cart so to speak.... going out in the real world...facing 
>> >> it...that's when the "trouble " starts...that's when you need the "tools 
>> >> of survival" to get through the day..
>> >> .reality dawns 
>> >> and reality can be a" bag of allsorts" as you all well know
>> >> that's when you need the" zen power" to get you through the day!
>> >> merle
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> JM,
>> >> 
>> >> >Serious practitioners were asked to sit at least one hour without 
>> >> >moving.  Mark Troxell, the one recently was transmitted with Buddha 
>> >> >Heart Imprint was told to meditate FOUR hours a day, I was told.  Yak..
>> >> 
>> >> Just out of interest, here's a schedule for a Vipassana retreat. 
>> >> Compulsory/not compulsory just means that you can meditate in your own 
>> >> room or in the main hall. You can see that there is a minimum of 10 hours 
>> >> a day meditation over 10 days - ALL conducted in Noble silence with no 
>> >> reading or writing material, music, books or cell phones etc.
>> >> 
>> >> 4:00 â€" 04:30 Get Up & Take a Shower
>> >> 04:30 â€" 06:30 Meditation in the Main Hall (not compulsory)
>> >> 06:30 â€" 08:00 Breakfast & Rest
>> >> 08:00 â€" 10:00 Group Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>> >> 10:00 â€" 11:00 Meditation in Hall (usually compulsory)
>> >> 11:00 â€" 13:00 Lunch & Rest
>> >> 13:00 â€" 14:30 Meditation in Hall (not compulsory)
>> >> 14:30 â€" 17:00 Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>> >> 17:00 â€" 18:00 Tea-time
>> >> 18:00 â€" 19:00 Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>> >> 19:00 â€" 20:20 Goenka Discourse Video
>> >> 20:30 â€" 21:00 Meditation in Hall (compulsory)
>> >> 21:00 â€" 22:00 Shower & Rest
>> >> 22:00 Lights Out
>> >> 
>> >> A pretty intense schedule, but a great opportunity be free of the usual 
>> >> daily distractions in order to go deep into the mind.
>> >> 
>> >> Mike
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> From: 覺妙精明 (JMJM) <chan.jmjm@...>
>> >> To: [email protected] 
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 7:15
>> >> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: suffering
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Let me add to this...  Surpass all comfort zone, all the knowledge, all 
>> >> the basis, in short everything,  is the key to Chan.
>> >> 
>> >> Our minimum requirement is half lotus.  Most of the serious practitioners 
>> >> do full lotus.  I do, because full lotus on the floor, opens up all the 
>> >> meridians near the hip and the legs, so that our body can be in tip top 
>> >> shape.
>> >> 
>> >> Serious practitioners were asked to sit at least one hour without moving. 
>> >>  Mark Troxell, the one recently was transmitted with Buddha Heart Imprint 
>> >> was told to meditate FOUR hours a day, I was told.  Yak..
>> >> 
>> >> jm
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> On 9/11/2012 7:45 PM, mike brown wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> Bill!,
>> >>> 
>> >>> There are many different reasons why practioners from different 
>> >>> traditions sit on their cushions. In Vipassana, we stay with the 
>> >>> discomfort to see into how and the body affects the mind. If we 
>> >>> constantly rearrange our sitting position when we experience discomfort, 
>> >>> we miss the opportunity to see how dukkha (dissatisfaction) operates. 
>> >>> That's one of the great things about mindfulness - we can go deeply into 
>> >>> phenomena to see the 3 Characteristics (impermanence, dukkha, no-self) 
>> >>> in operation. Sitting thru discomfort (dis-ease) is a great tool.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Mike
>> >>> 
>> >>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
>> >>> To: [email protected] 
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012, 2:37
>> >>> Subject: [Zen] Re: suffering
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> JMJM, et al...
>> >>> 
>> >>> My initial teachers encouraged me to switch legs, rock back and forth, 
>> >>> stand up and walk around and even use different postures, (full-lotus, 
>> >>> half-lotus, cross-legged, kneeling and even just sitting on a chair - as 
>> >>> long as whatever posture I used allowed me to breathe freely and deeply. 
>> >>> That requires at least an erect back to allow for 'belly breathing' 
>> >>> (breathing by using the diaphragm instead of the chest or shoulders). Of 
>> >>> course if we were sitting with a group we were encouraged not to change 
>> >>> legs or do anything overt which might bother others. Our sitting 
>> >>> sessions were usually 20-40 mins, then a 5-min break, and then another 
>> >>> session. We would sit 3 sessions like that.
>> >>> 
>> >>> ...Bill!
>> >>> 
>> >>> --- In [email protected], 覺妙精明 
>> >>> (JMJM) <chan.jmjm@> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If I may add to this...
>> >>> > 
>> >>> > My teacher asks us "avoid switching legs during sitting..." In other 
>> >>> > words, it is for training our mind to be detached from our physical 
>> >>> > body. Because, the physical body is our first hindrance to 
>> >>> > enlightenment. Then there is the hindrance of our mind and hindrance 
>> >>> > of 
>> >>> > our spirit to surpass next... Not hard. Right? :-)
>> >>> > 
>> >>> > 
>> >>> > On 9/11/2012 4:33 PM, mike brown wrote:
>> >>> > > ED,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > I can't talk about zazen, but in Vipassana, pain is something we're 
>> >>> > > taught to welcome (within reason) because it's a good tool to teach 
>> >>> > > us 
>> >>> > > insight into impermanence, suffering and an impersonal self. I can 
>> >>> > > honestly say that sitting without moving for an hour, or more, 
>> >>> > > sometimes creates the most intense pain I have ever suffered in my 
>> >>> > > life! The only time I've found that pain is completely alleviated is 
>> >>> > > when I've entered into the jhanas. This is no exaggeration. I've 
>> >>> > > gone 
>> >>> > > from the most intense white-hot pain to the most ecstatic bliss in 
>> >>> > > an 
>> >>> > > instant. Of course, and here's the lesson, this state passes and the 
>> >>> > > pain comes back once more. A valuable lesson in the arising and 
>> >>> > > passing of phenomena that is way beyond just an intellectual 
>> >>> > > understanding.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Mike
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > > *From:* ED <seacrofter001@>
>> >>> > > *To:* [email protected]
>> >>> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 September 2012, 15:16
>> >>> > > *Subject:* [Zen] Re: suffering
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Bill! and Mike,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Is it not the case that zazen or vipasana can also help alleviate 
>> >>> > > pain?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > --ED
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > --- In [email protected] 
>> >>> > > <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>, 
>> >>> > > "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Merle,
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > I am also 66!
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > I'm about to give you some of my definitions of terms and they're
>> >>> > > pretty 'tough-love' definitions so be warned...
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Pain is NOT suffering. Pain is pain. Suffering is feeling sorry for
>> >>> > > yourself (your self) because perhaps you're in pain and that does not
>> >>> > > meet up with your expectations and disappoints you.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > You do not have to suffer.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > The best example I know of this is a 3-legged dog. I'm sure you've
>> >>> > > seen many of them. They aren't suffering because (I presume) they 
>> >>> > > don't
>> >>> > > have a strong 'mental model' of 'self'. They don't feel sorry for
>> >>> > > themselves. They don't compare themselves to other dogs. They just 
>> >>> > > make
>> >>> > > do with what they've got. I've seen dogs with only 2 legs and they 
>> >>> > > don't
>> >>> > > act any differently than those with 4. You could be a little
>> >>> > > condescending and say 'they don't know any better' - when actually 
>> >>> > > you
>> >>> > > should be just saying 'they don't know' - and good for them.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Contrast that with a human who has lost a leg. Many such humans 
>> >>> > > > will
>> >>> > > suffer. They'll wonder 'why me'? 'What did I do to deserve this?' 
>> >>> > > And be
>> >>> > > envious of full-bodied humans who can do more and have more than 
>> >>> > > they.
>> >>> > > Why? Because they DO have a strong 'mental model' of 'self' and have
>> >>> > > expectations of what life SHOULD be like, and do compare themselves 
>> >>> > > with
>> >>> > > others. Their life is not like others (the majority) and this
>> >>> > > disappoints them so they suffer.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Zazen can help...
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > ...Bill!
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >
>>
>
>

 

Reply via email to