Bill!,<br/><br/>Ahh, here we go again! I notice you wrote that I'm talking about "Buddhism not zen" [lower case 'z']. This is *your* idiosyncratic interpretation and is out of step with every writer on the subject including all the Patriarchs and Dogen. Lower case zen is not something outside of Zen Buddhism (except for you). And Zen Buddhism is not separate from the Dharma. I challenge you to find anything central in Buddhism (I don't like the name myself, but you know what I mean) that you can <br/>contradict and still manifest Buddha (now there's and irony) Nature. <br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Chris Austin-Lane
- Re: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Edgar Owen
- [Zen] realisation Merle Lester
- [Zen] Re: realisation Joe
- [Zen] Re: realisation billsmart
- Re: [Zen] Re: realisation Merle Lester
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Joe
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Bill!
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
- Re: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Joe
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect Bill!
- [Zen] mountain climbing Merle Lester
- [Zen] Re: mountain climbing Bill!
- Re: [Zen] Re: mountain climbing Merle Lester
- Re: FW: RE: [Zen] Cause-and-Effect uerusuboyo
