On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, D. Eckert <cont...@desystems.cc> wrote:
> I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I
> can trace from your reply a typically American
> arrogant behavior.
>
> WE, THE PROUDEST AND infallibles on earth DID NEVER MAKE
> a mistake. It is just the stupid user who did not read the
> fucking manual carefully enough.
>
> ????

Ah... an illiterate AND idiotic bigot. Have you even read the manual
or *ANY* of the replies to your posts? *YOU* caused the situation that
resulted in your data being corrupted. Not Sun, not OpenSolaris, not
ZFS and not anyone on this list. Yet you feel the need to blame ZFS
and insult the people that have been trying to help you understand
what happened and why you shouldn't do what you did.

ZFS is not a filesystem like UFS or Reiserfs, nor is it an LVM like
SVM or VxVM. It is both a filesystem and a logical volume manager. As
such, like all LVM solutions, there are two steps that you must
perform to safely remove a disk: unmount the filesystem and quiesce
the volume. That means you *MUST*, in the case of ZFS, issue 'umount
filesystem' *AND* 'zpool export' before you yank the USB stick out of
the machine.

Effectively what you did was create a one-sided mirrored volume with
one filesystem on it, then put your very important (but not important
enough to bother mirroring or backing up) data on it. Then you
unmounted the filesystem and ripped the active volume out of the
machine. You got away with it a couple of times because just how good
of a job the ZFS developers did at idiot proofing it, but when it
finally got to the point where you lost your data, you came here to
bitch and point fingers at everyone but the responsible party (hint,
it's you). When your ignorance (and fault) was pointed out to you, you
then resorted to personal attacks and slurs. Nice. Very professional.
Welcome to the bit-bucket.

fpsm
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to