On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote: > > Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are > the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead > in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core > zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prior to > the merger?), and who's paying them. Assuming a worst case > scenario, what would be the best candidate for a fork? Nexenta? > Debian already included FreeBSD as a kernel flavor into its > fold, it seems Nexenta could be also a good candidate. > > Maybe anyone in the know could provide a short blurb on what > the state is, and what the options are.
Of course they can't. If they're in the know, then they're almost certainly not in a position to talk about it in public. Asking here does not help, as I doubt if anyone from Sun/Oracle would be wise to give any response. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
