Russ Price wrote:
Can you tell us the build
version of the opensolaris?

I'm currently on b134 (but I had the performance issues with 2009.06, b130, 
b131, b132, and b133 as well).

I may end up swapping the Phenom II X2 550 with an Athlon II X4 630 that I've 
put into another M4A785-M system. I noticed that the eight-disk scrub came 
close to maxing out both cores of the Phenom - so it wouldn't hurt to have a 
couple more cores in place of the extra cache and clock speed. However, even 
with the CPU nearly pegged, it was still serving files smoothly - vastly better 
than the rag-tag controller assortment.

If you're going to run a big array on OpenSolaris, it's a good idea to use a 
real HBA instead of consumer-grade interfaces. :o) The nice thing about the 
SASUC8I / SAS3081E-R is that, by default, it presents the array to the 
operating system as individual drives - perfect for ZFS.

 scrub: scrub completed after 1h33m with 0 errors on Thu Mar 11 19:17:01 2010
config:

        NAME           STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        tank           ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz2-0     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t1d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t7d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t6d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t4d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t0d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t5d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t2d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c11t3d0p1  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors

In general, I would heartily agree with Russ, in that the 8-port LSI-based PCI-E cards are very, very well worth the price. I'm a satisfied user of the Marvell-based PCI-X cards, too (at least, since the 2009.06 release).

That all said, I've had good experiences with the SiliconImage chips, though that experience has been limited to the PCI/PCI-X versions (3114/3124). They definitely are lower-end, though - I've never tried hot-swapping a drive attached to a SilIm controller.

---

Since you mentioned it, do you have access to an Athlon II and Phenom II at the same clock rate/core count? Would you be willing to test out a couple of things? I'm trying to determine whether the extra L3 cache on the Phenom makes any real difference for ZFS usage. As previously mentioned, More Cores > Higher Clock rate, at least for NAS usage.

--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop:  usca22-123
Phone:  x17195
Santa Clara, CA

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to