I will say the norm is in the other way around, according to the IPv6 Survey that I run continuously.
If I recall correctly, the last time I checked the data, over 70% of the responders use persistent prefixes. There is an old presentation (I'm not sure if is the last one I did, as I presented that many times and in many foras), that shows a similar % (but the survey is still running, so I could check new data every few months): https://indico.uknof.org.uk/event/41/contributions/542/attachments/712/866/bcop-ipv6-prefix-v9.pdf It is true that addresses are considered in all the EU personal data, but there is NOT such rule in any country (as I know), neither in the GDPR, that forces the renumbering or the use of non-persistent prefixes. There was rumors that Germany was doing that, but it is not true. See RIPE690 https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 6/9/19 8:59, "homenet en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson" <homenet-boun...@ietf.org en nombre de swm...@swm.pp.se> escribió: On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Ray Hunter (v6ops) wrote: > IMHO Expected behavior. Many European data protection people consider an > IP(v6) address to be privacy-sensitive personal data. That will likely > mean regular renumbering of IA PD by ISP's as the norm rather than the > exception. This is the first time I've seen anyone make this claim (I guess related to GDPR). I've gone through GDPR review and talked to others who have done the same, and I from a GDPR point of view there is no reason to renumber on a regular basis. From what I can tell, renumbering at some frequency makes no difference from a GDPR point of view. The addresses are privacy sensitive regardless if you change them frequently or not. My experience is that the frequent renumbering is a local market practice that people in that market got used to. As a swedish user, I hadn't heard of this practice until I started talking about these things with people that ran/experienced ISPs in other nations. The defaults are also different. Some markets have frequent renumbering (some even reset the PPPoE session once per day, which is a flash renumbering eevent), some never renumber unless there is a big network change (I've had the same IPv6 prefix now for a year). The conclusion is that we need to create solutions that handle both these cases. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
