Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> This is the first time I've seen anyone make this claim (I guess
> related to GDPR). I've gone through GDPR review and talked to others
> who have done the same, and I from a GDPR point of view there is no
> reason to renumber on a regular basis. From what I can tell,
> renumbering at some frequency makes no difference from a GDPR point of
> view. The addresses are privacy sensitive regardless if you change them
> frequently or not.
It would be nice to get a public legal opinion published somewhere, so that
it can't be used as a marketing excuse.
> The conclusion is that we need to create solutions that handle both
> these cases.
Agreed, and it would be nice if it wasn't a flash renumber, which resetting
of the PPPoE session can causes.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
