[sage-devel] Testing Sage's packages

2019-11-13 Thread John H Palmieri
I just set SAGE_CHECK=yes and tried to build Sage on several platforms: OS X and a virtual machine running Ubuntu. Summary: Failed on both: - gap: looks like some sort of string-vs-bytes problem (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28728) - cvxopt: fails with a Python 3 build, hangs (at least on

[sage-devel] Re: Package installation/uninstallation confusion

2019-11-11 Thread John H Palmieri
I created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28721 to add documentation for these to the developer's guide. Needs review. John On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 8:27:32 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > These shell functions are defined and documented in > SAGE_ROOT/build/bin/

[sage-devel] Re: Package installation/uninstallation confusion

2019-11-07 Thread John H Palmieri
These shell functions are defined and documented in SAGE_ROOT/build/bin/sage-dist-helpers. In my opinion they should also be documented in the developer's guide, but they don't seem to be. On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 6:35:05 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Dima, > > On 2019-11-06,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Package installation/uninstallation confusion

2019-11-06 Thread John H Palmieri
Simon, you should look at the json file for p_group_cohomology to see if it contains all of the installed files, or if indeed some are not listed. If everything is there, there is no need to split it into two packages, unless I'm missing something. On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 9:33:04

Re: [sage-support] Re: sage building with python3

2019-11-04 Thread John H Palmieri
If you want to build Sage for use with Python 3, you should do $ make distclean $ ./configure --with-python=3 $ make Where does this fail for you? On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 8:21:04 AM UTC-8, Александр Ватузов wrote: > > No, I am building sage only for using it with python3. So I need to

[sage-devel] Re: OSX Catalina works

2019-11-03 Thread John H Palmieri
lled xcode from the > appsrtore I am using the latest versions av I am using: > > ProductName:Mac OS X > ProductVersion:10.15.1 > BuildVersion:19B88 > Xcode 11.2 > Build version 11B52 > > Andrew > > > > > On Saturday, 2 November 2019 05:45:

Re: [sage-support] Re: sage building with python3

2019-11-03 Thread John H Palmieri
Since trac #28426 (merged pretty recently), when building with Python 3, we do not build Python 2. Before that, we always built both. On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 12:57:02 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I am surprised we still even build python2 by default. Isn't it an > optional

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Optional and experimental packages

2019-11-01 Thread John H Palmieri
/28687: change scons from optional to experimental. I thought briefly of trying to upgrade it instead, but I don't really care about the package, so someone else who is actually interested will have to do that. John On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 1:27:34 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Optional and experimental packages

2019-11-01 Thread John H Palmieri
Note that "sage --sws2rst ..." relies on sagenb, and therefore will only work with Sage built with Python 2. In any case, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28685 upgrades to beautifulsoup4, which is compatible with Python 3. On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 3:43:32 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > >

[sage-devel] Re: OSX Catalina works

2019-11-01 Thread John H Palmieri
I just upgraded a different machine to Catalina. This one didn't have Xcode or homebrew installed beforehand, so I installed Xcode, its command-line tools, and homebrew's gcc. Then I built Sage and it worked. I have now installed a bunch of other homebrew packages relevant to Sage, and the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Catalina works

2019-11-01 Thread John H Palmieri
If you have the time, could you try uninstalling Xcode and then reinstalling it? You might also try uninstalling and reinstalling homebrew's gcc and any other homebrew components that are relevant to Sage. There may be some remnants of previously installed software that is somehow interfering.

[Bacula-users] Bacula: improving logging?

2019-10-31 Thread John H Nyhuis
09:58 Scalar-i40 JobId 28: Spooling data again ... In my opinion, the fact that the spooler is working and doing it's job isn't something that needs to be logged. Knowing what file is currently being read would be nice. Thanks in Advance, -- Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyh

Re: [sage-devel] MacOS 10.15.1: gfortran does not compile in sage-8.9

2019-10-30 Thread John H Palmieri
I tried building several version of gfortran by hand on 10.15, but I couldn't succeed, whereas I could with 10.14. I didn't try just upgrading Sage's gfortran/gcc package to 9.x. On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 3:21:58 PM UTC-7, François Bissey wrote: > > I suspect gcc/gfortran shipped with

[sage-devel] Re: MacOS 10.15.1: gfortran does not compile in sage-8.9

2019-10-30 Thread John H Palmieri
I also had problems with Sage's gfortran package with OS X Catalina. I instead installed homebrew (https://brew.sh), and used homebrew to install their gcc package. This should install gfortran, which Sage will find as part of its configure process, thereby bypassing Sage's gfortran package.

Re: [CentOS] udev on CEntOS7 - can't get a match, looking for tips...

2019-10-29 Thread John H Nyhuis
hmmm, I thought := assigned a key just like +=, except := locked it so it could not be changed later. Am I misunderstanding the man page for udev? Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyh...@uw.edu Box 359461, 15th floor, 106 On 10/29/2019 4:31 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] udev on CEntOS7 - can't get a match, looking for tips...

2019-10-29 Thread John H Nyhuis
Thanks, I did catch the mistype (after IU posted). Still no match with the typo fixed... :-( Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyh...@uw.edu Box 359461, 15th floor, 106 On 10/29/2019 4:03 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <7025a0a8-1471-530d-dad0-3770e902c...@uw.edu>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Catalina works

2019-10-29 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 4:45:53 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > > Thanks Dima > > On Tuesday, 29 October 2019 17:51:02 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> Did you run >> >> xcode-select --install >> >> after Xcode upgrade? >> > > Yes, the command line tools are correctly installed but, as

[sage-devel] Re: Optional and experimental packages

2019-10-28 Thread John H Palmieri
Oops, I spoke too soon. Two more files had failures: - sage -t --long src/sage/databases/stein_watkins.py # 20 doctests failed - sage -t --long src/sage/interfaces/frobby.py # 12 doctests failed On Monday, October 28, 2019 at 3:02:23 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > With a Python 3

[sage-devel] Optional and experimental packages

2019-10-28 Thread John H Palmieri
With a Python 3 build of Sage on OS X 10.14.6, I decided to install as many optional and experimental packages as I could. The results: *Optional:* - the following packages failed to build, and the reason wasn't completely obvious: awali buckygen cbc gambit gdb mpi4py - the following

[CentOS] udev on CEntOS7 - can't get a match, looking for tips...

2019-10-28 Thread John H Nyhuis
reached}=="0" ATTRS{device_blocked}=="0" ATTRS{evt_mode_parameter_change_reported}=="0" ATTRS{evt_lun_change_reported}=="0" ATTRS{evt_inquiry_change_reported}=="0" ATTRS{dh_state}=="detached" ATTRS{i

Re: [sage-devel] Switch to Python 3 by default

2019-10-26 Thread John H Palmieri
+1 On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 5:27:51 PM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: > > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28660 > > > Le 26/10/2019 à 17:20, François Bissey a écrit : > > +1 > > > >> On 27/10/2019, at 12:58 PM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.d...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> >

[sage-support] Re: failure to re-install ipython

2019-10-25 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 2:59:36 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > in the Sage 9.0.beta2 I get > > [ipython-5.8.0] Successfully installed ipython-5.8.0 > [ipython-5.8.0] Cleaning up... > [ipython-5.8.0] Removed build tracker '/tmp/pip-req-tracker-h6h22jg5' > [ipython-5.8.0] >

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-10-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 10:57:09 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:48 PM Nils Bruin > > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 10:29:48 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: > >> > >> > >> I guess via ctypes it would be possible too. > > > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-10-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 9:49:56 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 2:47:54 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 1:41:35 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: >>> >>> On Wedne

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-10-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 1:41:35 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 1:26:46 PM UTC-7, John Cremona wrote: >> >> >> That all looks very complicated. Before I fixed the eclib source code >> the previous method did work, namely to flush stdout and stderr

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-10-23 Thread John H Palmieri
side-library > > is it what would work for us? > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, 20:06 John H Palmieri, > wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 2:06:21 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM John H Palmieri >&g

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-10-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 2:06:21 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > I am writing to ask for help fixing a Python 3 problem. On some > platforms, there are Python 3 doctest failures in > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Question about deprecation warnings: when do they appear in doctests vs. real life?

2019-10-19 Thread John H Palmieri
ey have the deprecated behavior in > a function they've written. > David > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:56 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> Here is a doctest from sage/rings/integer.pyx: >> >> sage: Integer('012') >> doctest:...: DeprecationWa

[sage-devel] Question about deprecation warnings: when do they appear in doctests vs. real life?

2019-10-19 Thread John H Palmieri
Here is a doctest from sage/rings/integer.pyx: sage: Integer('012') doctest:...: DeprecationWarning: use 0o as octal prefix instead of 0 If you do not want this number to be interpreted as octal, remove the leading zeros. See http://trac.sagemath.org/17413 for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

2019-10-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 10:25:07 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi John, > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:08 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > I have compiled it without any problems. You should not be using gcc > from homebrew, but rather the ver

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

2019-10-18 Thread John H Palmieri
I have compiled it without any problems. You should not be using gcc from homebrew, but rather the version of gcc installed by Xcode or its command-line tools. That might help. (You should install the homebrew gcc package to get gfortran, but at least for me, installing homebrew's gcc

Re: Yahoo Groups going away

2019-10-17 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
, since this past February, you also have to pay in order to have Groups.IO do the moving of your messages, files and photos.  No freebie for that anymore. -- John H. Reinhardt

[sage-devel] Need help with Python 3, doctesting framework, and patchbot

2019-10-17 Thread John H Palmieri
With a Python 3 build of Sage, there are three files which exhibit failures only (or primarily?) when running the Sage patchbot. This is being tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28622. Can anyone help figure out the problem and how to fix it? To see the problem, cd to SAGE_ROOT, run

Re: [sage-devel] OSX Catalina works

2019-10-13 Thread John H Palmieri
A few days ago, after the Catalina release, I used Homebrew to build gcc, and it worked. Well, it built from source, which took a while, but it built a version of gfortran which worked well enough to build Sage. (As far as I know, it's completely functional, but the only reason I install

Re: [sage-support] SageMath installation in macOS Catalina

2019-10-09 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 4:51:48 AM UTC-7, David Joyner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 7:42 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:34 AM David Joyner > > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 7:14 AM Dima Pasechnik >> > wrote: >>> Hi,

Re: [sage-devel] scipy fails to build Sage 8.9 - MacOS 10.14.6

2019-10-08 Thread John H Palmieri
On OS X, Sage by default should use the system's "gcc" (which is actually clang), so it's okay to not have a symlink connecting gcc-9 to gcc in /usr/local/bin. What you really need is /usr/local/bin/gfortan, and homebrew should provide that. John On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 3:56:24 PM

[sage-devel] Package installation/uninstallation confusion

2019-09-27 Thread John H Palmieri
I have been testing new versions of Simon King's p-group cohomology package. The current version doesn't work with Python 3, and he has been working (#28414) to fix this. My workflow: 1. check out his git branch 2. run ./sage -f -c p_group_cohomology 3. report any issues 4.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Build failure at matplotlib-2.2.4 and sagenb-1.1.2 on OS X

2019-09-25 Thread John H Palmieri
Could you also trying using Homebrew to install gfortran? On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 12:09:55 PM UTC-7, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > Ok, I tried the Homebrew route, and still the build failed. First, the > computer successfully executed the following: > > brew install

[sage-devel] Re: Build failure at matplotlib-2.2.4 and sagenb-1.1.2 on OS X

2019-09-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 10:12:17 AM UTC-7, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm attempting to build Sage from the develop branch on a new office > computer running OS X 10.14.6. I've installed Xcode and Command Line Tools > (or at least I thought I had), and I'm getting a build

[RBW] Re: All Rounder

2019-09-24 Thread John H.
Beautiful build. I've been thinking about running Campy ergo's of that generation on my Sam. What's the jtek/cassette setup you have? How's it shifting? John in Cambridge On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 2:32:36 AM UTC-4, Joe Bernard wrote: > > Here's the first shots of my new-to-me A/R sans

[RBW] Re: All Rounder

2019-09-24 Thread John H.
Beautiful build. I was thinking of running a similar shimergo setup on my Sam. What jtek + cassette combo are you running? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-devel] Re: Poll: three.js as the default 3d viewer in Sage

2019-09-23 Thread John H Palmieri
+1 for threejs I tried to compare the two: in a single Jupyter notebook, I plotted the same function with both viewers. threejs produced the plot faster, and it was snappier when rotating, zooming, etc. (This is with both Firefox and Safari on OS X.) Same from the command-line: the threejs

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.rc0 released

2019-09-12 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 12:30:34 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:55 PM John Cremona > wrote: > > > > On ubuntu, upgrade from previous beta, python3 configured: make > ptestlong succeeds except for > > > > sage -t --long --warn-long 81.2

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-12 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 3:13:07 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray > wrote: > > > > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in > GAP: > > > > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.rc0 released

2019-09-11 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 4:36:46 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > OS X + Python 3: All tests

Re: [sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-09-09 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 2:06:21 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > I am writing to ask for help fixing a Python 3 problem. On some > platforms, there are Python 3 doctest failures in > > >

[sage-devel] Python 3 and flushing output from external libraries

2019-09-09 Thread John H Palmieri
I am writing to ask for help fixing a Python 3 problem. On some platforms, there are Python 3 doctest failures in - libs/eclib/interface.py (#28454) - rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx (#28334) and both occur for the same reason: warning messages printed by C or C++ libraries are

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-03 Thread John H Palmieri
With a Python 3 build on OS X, I get a sporadic failure in numerical/linear_tensor_element.pyx — it fails not every time, but at least half the time. As far as I can tell, this is due to #27587 (that is, I get failures with 8.9.beta8 + that ticket, but not with 8.9.beta8), but I don't

Re: DecNet / Linux

2019-09-01 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
). For anyone who is interested the code is available at: <https://github.com/JohnForecast/RaspbianDECnet <https://github.com/JohnForecast/RaspbianDECnet>> John. Thanks! Looking forward to trying it out. -- John H. Reinhardt

[sage-devel] Re: Wrong python in Sage shell?

2019-08-29 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 7:15:51 AM UTC-7, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Hello > > Somebody (else) should make sure that every single remaining piece of > python2 is removed from a python3 sage. In particular, we should not build > python2 at all. > See

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

2019-08-26 Thread John H Palmieri
On Sunday, August 25, 2019 at 3:37:50 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > It is nearing the end of the 8.9

Re: Too many DEC binders

2019-08-25 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
the EOL of various platforms - VAX is 2011, Alpha is 2017, Integrity is ongoing still but coming to an end soon. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: Too many DEC binders

2019-08-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
and that happens to all documents as far as I can tell.  I haven't checked with Adobe. The colors seemed good, too.  The covers were good and the red highlights inside were legible. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: Too many DEC binders

2019-08-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 8/24/2019 4:11 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: On 8/24/19 1:38 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: On 8/24/2019 3:30 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: I'll have to double check, but from the looks of this list I don't need the VAX/VMS Grey Wall that I acquired a couple months

Re: Raspberry Pi write cycles

2019-08-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
s to build the 75 different emulators.  It has the latest updates to Raspbian Buster. What USB3 thumb drive did you use? -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: Too many DEC binders

2019-08-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 8/24/2019 3:30 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: I'll have to double check, but from the looks of this list I don't need the VAX/VMS Grey Wall that I acquired a couple months ago.  It's a nearly pristine set of the V5.0 VAX/VMS documentation set. Some volumes are still sealed

Re: Too many DEC binders

2019-08-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
./VMS_5.0_Apr88/aa-lb25a-te_VMS_5.0_Obsolete_Features_Manual_Apr88.tar ./VMS_5.0_Apr88/aa-lb34a-te_VAXstation_2000_Installation_Apr88.tar ./VMS_5.0_Apr88/ey-d209e-sg-0001.tar -- John H. Reinhardt PRRT #8909 C HS #11530 N-Trak #7566

Re: Current MANX location

2019-08-20 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 8/20/2019 11:26 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: On 8/20/2019 11:08 PM, John H. Reinhardt wrote: On 8/20/2019 10:37 PM, Zane Healy wrote: On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:16 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk  wrote: On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote: On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43

Re: Current MANX location

2019-08-20 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 8/20/2019 11:08 PM, John H. Reinhardt wrote: On 8/20/2019 10:37 PM, Zane Healy wrote: On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:16 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote: On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: From: Glen Slick

Re: Current MANX location

2019-08-20 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
for. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta6 released

2019-08-15 Thread John H Palmieri
Yes, that fits. Now that I know to look, I see buried in my gap install log Uninstalling existing 'gap' Running pre-uninstall script for 'gap' /Users/jpalmier/Desktop/Sage/git/sage/local/var/lib/sage/scripts/gap/spkg-prerm: line 13:

[sage-support] debian virtual machine numerical noise

2019-08-09 Thread John H Palmieri
In order to try to track down the problem with Python 3 and polynomial_rational_flint.pyx on Debian (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334 — help wanted!), I installed VirtualBox and a Debian 10 virtual machine on my iMac. Most doctests pass, but I am getting some numerical noise. Did I

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-08 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 5:55:53 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 2 août 2019 18:07:16 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri

[lattedock] [Bug 410465] Latte-dock did not close properly on reboot

2019-08-06 Thread John H
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410465 --- Comment #4 from John H --- Latte-dock has not crashed on subsequent updates. Clearing the cache made no perceptible difference to performance. I have never run the dock from the command line. Since the crash the optional Lock / Logout widget

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta5 released

2019-08-03 Thread John H Palmieri
New failure with Python 3: sage -t --warn-long 78.7 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py ** File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 503, in sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable Failed example: print(err) Expected: Cython

[sage-devel] Re: Grepping Trac

2019-08-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 1:36:36 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 11:39:47 AM UTC-7, Timo Kaufmann wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> As part of my packaging workflow, I find myself pasting error messages >> into the trac search pretty frequently to discover if something is

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 9:07:16 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >> >> >> >> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit : >>> >>

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit : >> >> Another question: does Flint pass its test suite on these machines? >> > > How could I run this test su

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-01 Thread John H Palmieri
Another question: does Flint pass its test suite on these machines? On Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 3:52:07 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Do you get the same failure with Python 2? If not, any ideas why > "Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate memory

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-01 Thread John H Palmieri
Do you get the same failure with Python 2? If not, any ideas why "Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate memory" would depend on the version of Python? Flint doesn't depend on Python, so if it's Python 3 only, is there some issue with the Flint interface? On Tuesday, July 30,

[kde] [Bug 410465] Latte-dock did not close properly on reboot

2019-07-31 Thread John H
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410465 John H changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|unspecified |Archlinux Packages -- You are receiving this mail

[kde] [Bug 410465] New: Latte-dock did not close properly on reboot

2019-07-31 Thread John H
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410465 Bug ID: 410465 Summary: Latte-dock did not close properly on reboot Product: kde Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Keywords:

Re: [sage-support] Is there a binary version of SageMath .app.dmg compatiable with Mac OS X ver. 10.14.6

2019-07-26 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 9:33:25 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 12:32:06 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 06:26, Samuel Dupree wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> I

Re: [sage-support] Is there a binary version of SageMath .app.dmg compatiable with Mac OS X ver. 10.14.6

2019-07-26 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 12:32:06 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 06:26, Samuel Dupree > wrote: > >> >> >> I'm attempting to update SageMath-8.7.app on an iMacPro running Mac OS X >> ver. 10.14.6 tp SageMath-8.8.app. The problem for the moment occurs when I

RB 3.0.15: warnings from rb-site update_index

2019-07-22 Thread john h
Hi all, I recently upgraded a ReviewBoard install from Ubuntu 14.04/RB 1.6.9 to 18.04/3.0.15. I did it by advancing through each final minor release of RB with pip (starting with 1.7.xx, since that was the earliest available via pip), and running rb-site upgrade and recommended

[sage-devel] signature missing in introspection some of the time

2019-07-20 Thread John H Palmieri
See https://ask.sagemath.org/question/47214/help-doesnt-show-function-call/. Some of the time when you evaluate blah? the signature is not present. Is this a bug or is it intended? I like this behavior: sage: A = SteenrodAlgebra() sage: A.antipode? Signature: B.antipode(self, *args)

Re: Computer Reset shop, liquidation. (USA)

2019-07-17 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
. -- Will Just curious, but anything worth scanning (DEC)?  Not that I'll make it to VCFmw this year.  I'm in/near Fort Worth, TX so it's a long haul for me.  But they all are from here. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: R: OT: the end of Dyn DNS

2019-06-27 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
.  Apparently some people have had problems with the host not letting them move the name registration when switching hosting providers.  Or vice versa. I don't have any experience with that. I've either self hosted or, like now, have co-located hardware. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: OT: the end of Dyn DNS

2019-06-26 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
any do that? For free? Or cheap? I didn't dig real deep into providers. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: RSTS collection in the UK

2019-06-26 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
estimate? -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: RSTS collection in the UK

2019-06-25 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 6/25/2019 8:00 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: On 6/25/19 5:35 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: I hope someone scans that RSTS/E documentation.  There isn't a lot of it available online. Seriously? I count 75 manuals under pdp11/rsts on bitsavers Sounds like a lot, I know

Re: RSTS collection in the UK

2019-06-25 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
t I'm in Fort Worth, TX -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2019-06-25 Thread John H Palmieri
I am writing to follow up on this. The University of Washington has now stopped accepting donations to the Sage Foundation fund. People looking for ways to donate in support of Sage will need to find other avenues for that, and I encourage people to create those avenues if they know how. Of

Re: [sage-support] The behavior of empty sums

2019-06-25 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 3:10:29 AM UTC-7, Peter Luschny wrote: > > Am Di., 25. Juni 2019 um 10:49 Uhr 'luisfe' : > > | When n =0, k ranges from 0 to -1 so there is no k and the list > constructed in ib(n,m) > | is just the empty list. Not an empty list of polynomials, just an empty >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc2 released

2019-06-19 Thread John H Palmieri
This problem is being discussed at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28008. As François says, you can touch matrix_rational_dense.pyx and do "sage -b", or you can do "sage -ba" to rebuild all of Sage's library files, in case other ones are also affected. On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 5:52:19

[sage-devel] Re: Installation gets stuck when it tries to download zeromq-4.2.5.tar.gz

2019-06-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 10:12:06 AM UTC-7, Parth Dubal wrote: > > I tried to download manually and put it into upstream directory but it is > already present and the installation didn't even reach to that step. I > don't understand, if it was already downloaded earlier then why the >

[sage-devel] Re: Installation gets stuck when it tries to download zeromq-4.2.5.tar.gz

2019-06-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 8:47:31 AM UTC-7, Parth Dubal wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried three times to install sage as described in github on my virtual > machine (Ubuntu 19) but the installation gets stuck for hours at the point > of downloading zeromq-4.2.5.tar.gz. I am running ubuntu on

Re: Missing posts in archive and no Subject: line

2019-06-18 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
in Thunderbird... I'd wondered how it happened. ;) Noel -- John H. Reinhardt

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-10 Thread John H Palmieri
I am having a problem on a different OS X machine (an iMac Pro): sage -t src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/explicit_methods_in_number_theory/birds_other.rst Bad exit: 1 ** ... sage: dimension(M.cuspidal_subspace()) ## line 109

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-10 Thread John H Palmieri
d for me, too. > > David. > > Le 9 juin 2019 à 23:23, John H Palmieri > > a écrit : > > I performed the incremental build the way I always do: "git pull trac" > followed by "make". When I ran into problems, I restarted from 8.8.beta7, > wh

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-09 Thread John H Palmieri
is an incremental build problem. > Something that should have been rebuilt didn’t and that may be because of > the way you performed the incremental build. > > François > > > On 10/06/2019, at 7:46 AM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > > > > > O

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-09 Thread John H Palmieri
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 12:37:52 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I think the problem is with the openblas upgrade, > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27847. > I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27961 (not that I know how to fix it...) > > > On Sunday, Jun

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-09 Thread John H Palmieri
I think the problem is with the openblas upgrade, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27847. On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 10:19:27 AM UTC-7, David Coudert wrote: > > crash with both python 2 and python 3 on osX. I attach the crash report > with python 3. > > Any help is more than welcome. > >

Re: [sage-devel] Apple deprecates Python

2019-06-08 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 8:56:09 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:50 John H Palmieri, > wrote: > >> >> >> On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 1:25:11 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: >>> >>> Le 07/06/2019 à 16:44,

Re: [sage-devel] Apple deprecates Python

2019-06-08 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 1:25:11 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: > > Le 07/06/2019 à 16:44, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2019-06-07 16:38, E. Madison Bray wrote: > >> While I agree it's part of an annoying trend, this is one change I > >> welcome: The Python interpreter shipped in OSX has

Re: [sage-devel] Apple deprecates Python

2019-06-07 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 7:44:03 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2019-06-07 16:38, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > While I agree it's part of an annoying trend, this is one change I > > welcome: The Python interpreter shipped in OSX has always *always* > > been broken and unusable > >

[sage-support] Re: A genuine bug in numerical evaluation ?

2019-06-06 Thread John H Palmieri
Oh, and Sage with Python 3 is in pretty good shape these days. Still some doctest failures, but I think it is mostly very functional. John On Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 3:20:25 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I can confirm that it works for me on OS X with Python 3, gives the

[sage-support] Re: A genuine bug in numerical evaluation ?

2019-06-06 Thread John H Palmieri
I can confirm that it works for me on OS X with Python 3, gives the error you described with Python 2. On Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 2:57:08 PM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > According to Serge Lelièvre, the proble doesn't occur when ran under a > Python3-based Sage. He advises to run

Re: 9-Track Magtape Drive ID

2019-06-01 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 6/1/2019 5:24 PM, Mark J. Blair via cctalk wrote: On Jun 1, 2019, at 14:57, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: Is this the system that was on Reddit? Yes. I’ll be fetching it next weekend. I’m excited! I wonder if the hard drive is still usable, and if there is anything interesting

Re: 9-Track Magtape Drive ID

2019-06-01 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
? -- John H. Reinhardt PRRT #8909 C HS #11530 N-Trak #7566

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >