On Sat, 23 Sept 2023 at 04:58, Nux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to add printing support to a sort of minimal installation, but it
> seems like there is no yum/dnf group for printing and the
> system-config-printer is not available anymore.
> How does one go about installing printing support?
>
>
I
Does anyone know what ways it is failing (or how I can duplicate it ) and I
can forward to the podman group (can't promise I can get it fixed.. but
will do what I can). Also if people have already opened issues on the
failures, let me know.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 at 14:34, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> We
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 13:39, Patrick Begou <
patrick.be...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
> I all,
>
> on a freshly installed Alma Linux 8.7 I can see a syncthing process
> communicating over https to a remote unknown server.
> Syncthing is installed automaticaly but what does this process with
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 12:07, wrote:
> I've installed it has server with gui. So maybe it does think it's a
> workstation?
> Didn't see much in the log, just stopped reporting at 1 this morning then
> started
> up with booting messages.
>
> Mar 1 00:40:23 alma1 systemd[1]:
I ran `dnf update` on pagure02.fedoraproject.org thinking I was working on
a different system. The box has been updated to the latest packages. Once I
realized my mistake I reviewed the changes and did not see anything that I
felt would affect pagure's operation.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Let us be
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 at 12:00, wrote:
> How do I keep my server from "sleeping". It shuts down, but power light
> is still on and nothing will bring it back
> except power cycling. I've tried everything I can find on disabling sleep
> and hibernation but it still keeps "sleeping".
> What good
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 06:56, Adrian Sevcenco
wrote:
> Does anyone use ganglia gmond under alma 9?
> And does anyone have any idea why the epel provided gmond does not have
> the python modules?
>
>
Looking at the spec file, the ganglia modules are only created when python2
is available. Python2
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 11:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/23 10:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 10:36, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>
>> I have a new HPE Prioliant gen10plus that I will be setting up with RAID1.
&
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 10:36, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have a new HPE Prioliant gen10plus that I will be setting up with RAID1.
>
> I have been asking questions on the Centos-user list, but my plan is to
> install AlmaLinux 9.1
>
> And I have been following comments about problems with RAID
t_linux.aspx
), the Gen8 only supports RHEL 6 and RHEL 7. I am going to bet everything
from network card to hard drive controller is EOL in EL8 and above on a
Gen8.
> thanks
>
> On 1/3/23 08:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 06:19, Alessandro Baggi
was only supported to boot non-EUFI or required the
EUFI to be on a separate drive.]
> On 1/3/23 08:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 06:19, Alessandro Baggi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>> I'm sorry to bother you during holidays.
>>
&g
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 03:08, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:45, Stephen Jolley
> wrote:
> > We’d welcome a proposal/series on how to move forward with the Y2038
> work for 32 bit platforms.
>
> I have the following proposal:
>
> 1. A branch is made where:
> a.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:18, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Lately, I've been using the COPR ARM builders a fair bit: I've been
> working on Fedora Asahi stuff with Davide Cavalca for the past several
> months, and I've noticed that builds in COPR are easily at least 2x
> slower than their
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 09:55,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to have a feature like RHEL EUS [1] for minor releases long
> term support ?
>
>
I don't think it is easily possible. The EUS packages are only available to
customers of Red Hat. They are not uploaded in an open place like the ones
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 10:25, John Horne wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 14:27 +0100, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> >
> > Additionally I'm looking for feedback about the prelink timeout issue
> > addressed by pull request #42 [PR#42]. Note that the original patch
> > dates back to 2010 and needs
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 17:06, Ranbir wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> On my AlmaLinux 9 installs, the cockpit motd I'm used to seeing upon
> login via ssh isn't being shown. I've looked at the symlinks that get
> created when the unit is enabled and everything appears to be fine, yet
> no motd
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 14:39, Lana Deere wrote:
> I was comparing the packages in the AlmaLinux9 ISO with those in the RHEL
> 9 ISO and found differences. Most the naming differences are "alma"
> versions of the rpms, similar to these:
> < libstdc++-devel-11.2.1-9.4.el9.alma.i686.rpm
> <
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 10:57, John Thompson wrote:
> I just reinstalled almalinux-9 after an selinux screw-up and cannot get
> xfce to work. I've installed all the requisite packages, but the gdm
> login screen no longer shows an option to select a different desktop
> (i.e. no "gear" icon). I
; ---
> Nux
> www.nux.ro
>
>
> On 2022-05-13 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 08:12, Nux wrote:
>
> Thanks both.
>
> This is what I saw in that particular Rocky installation:
> https://pastebin.com/raw/bKnFMM9a
>
>
gt;
>
> On 2022-05-13 13:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 06:18, Nux wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We've just been bit by some libvirt updates in our project (Apache
> Cloudstack) which basically broke basic functionality on AlmaLinux 8.4.
>
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 06:18, Nux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've just been bit by some libvirt updates in our project (Apache
> Cloudstack) which basically broke basic functionality on AlmaLinux 8.4.
> I expected the same problem to happen on RockyLinux 8.4, however turns
> out the libvirt on this
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 20:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing --whatprovides "libpoppler-qt5.so*"
> nothing ?!?
>
>
> I missed repoquery word .
>
> dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing repoquery --whatprovides
>
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 08:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL.
>
> I have just found out that the pybind11 component from c9s / RHEL 9 CRB
> has
> been built in EPEL 9 in different version:
>
>
>
> Do I understand correctly that this is still *not* allowed? If so, what
> can we
> do to
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 04:22, Alex Iribarren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/29/22 21:17, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 14:28, Germano Massullo
> > mailto:germano.massu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Recent Ce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 14:28, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
>
>
This is the current situation of events for
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 14:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in
> epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
>
> ...
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 09:54, Amos wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600 Erinn Looney-Triggs
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provid...
>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:55, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> Current process (two bugzilla pings, two weeks total time):
>> - 1st request
>> - one week goes by
>> - 2nd request
>> - one week goes by
>> - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator
>>
>> Proposal A (three bugzilla pings, three weeks
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 00:25, Carl George wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:54 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> >
> > Also could we tell if deps changed? Say I have
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 17:00, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 3/2/22 14:14, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Except that we are going to need python38-pytest, etc. in the EPEL8
> buildroot
> > if we are going to build (most of) the packages in the first place.
> That's
> > the problem
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 11:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > OK with some help from Miro on the python team, I was able to use the
> > scripts they use regularly to list what dependency problems they have
> with
> > soon
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 15:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> #
>
> I expect that
>
>
I clearly dropped the ball in that sentence. Let me finish it up:
I expect that we will need to converse in this thread about what should be
done next. In the EPEL meeting Kevin me
When EPEL-8 was trying to get out the door, I tried to make it 'fully
operational' by having fedpkg in it. It turned out that was a bad idea on
my part as I ended up adding about 130 packages to EPEL-8 which have not
been updated or cared for since.
The problems involved is that I did this with
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> > >
> > > fails to build with:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 03:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
>
> fails to build with:
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
>
> This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
>
> I
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 11:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 2/24/22 11:12, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 10:50, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>
>> It is time to upgrade systems here, and it seems that arm32 has been
>>
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 10:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> It is time to upgrade systems here, and it seems that arm32 has been
> left in the scrap heap. Shame with all the Allwinner boards I have...
>
> Is there a list of tested aarch64 systems? I am particularly looking
> for ones with 4GB
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 15:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 3:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a Fedora package that I've recently also branched for EPEL 9.
> >
> > The (so called) binary package used to be called "python3-tox", but has
> been
> > renamed to
And of course sending emails like this do not help make things better for
either party. My apologies and I am going to cut back on sending email
without a 24 hour "Did you really want to send this timeout?"
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 07:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 07:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL packagers.
>
> I get it that you want as much as possible packages available in EPEL 9,
> but
> before you blindly branch all the dependencies of the packages you care
> about,
> could you maybe take a step back and consider for a
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 05:55, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using AlmaLinux 8.5 on my workstation. Today running dnf update I
> noticed that it is trying to install new packages, This is the list of
> available upgrade:
>
> cockpit
> cockpit-bridge
> cockpit-system
> cockpit-ws
>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 12:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 09:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> I've gotten frequent requests to support EPEL branches of packages I
>>>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:14, Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> CentOS 8 mirrors are still currently only. What errors are you seeing?
>
>
So today was the last day that CentOS 8 would be on the main mirrors. The
mirrorlist will return
```
curl 'http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8=x86_64=os'
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 17:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 16:22, Christopher Cox
> wrote:
>
>> We are converting from CentOS to AlmaLinux, but noticed that AlmaLinux
>> versions
>> are just 8.5, where CentOS adopted the idea of a
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 16:22, Christopher Cox
wrote:
> We are converting from CentOS to AlmaLinux, but noticed that AlmaLinux
> versions
> are just 8.5, where CentOS adopted the idea of an extra qualifier
> representing a
> "level" within the version
>
> For example in CentOS 8, you see:
>
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 07:23, Nick Howitt wrote:
>
>
> On 27/01/2022 12:20, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 04:38, Nick Howitt via epel-devel
> > > <mailto:epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 04:38, Nick Howitt via epel-devel <
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi gents,
> It looks like btrbk has been updated to version 0.31.3-1 in EPEL7 from
> 0.25.1-1 and it has a requires of btrfs-progs >= 4.12. Unfortunately
> btrfs-progs in Centos 7 is still at
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 07:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 01. 22 12:49, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> On 15. 01. 22 20:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>>
> python-pytest-cov is something I've
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> I mirrored the source rpms down and did the following for 8 and 9-stream.
> ```
> $ for i in AppStream BaseOS PowerTools; do echo $i; find ./$i -type f
> -name "*src.rpm" | xargs rpm --nosignature --qf='
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:22, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 8:12 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing
>> from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8. The latest I found was cppunit, which
>> appears to be completely missing
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 10:58, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > It seems that there is some kind of bottleneck somewhere, because the
> > delay often gets progressively worse if there are lots of
> > notifications in a short period of
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 18:21, Fred wrote:
> Is it safe to just remove files from /var/cache on a running system, or is
> there a correct procedure for doing that?
>
> Mine has hit over 3 gigs, making it one of the larger directories in /,
> which is running low on space. I've hit all the
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 13:58, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 1:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 02:27:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:17:42PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > > At this point
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 21:20, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > F36 but needs to be worked through the proper channels of 'upstream'. Get
> > the FHS updated and fixed, work out that the change actually is going to
&g
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 16:16, Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Also please realise that the community can eat only so many changes per
> > release no matter how much you w
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 12/29/21 09:59, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The modern day case where /usr is read-only is inside a container and
> > you put an overlay or using some sort of linking to /var which is
> > read-write in case of
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 12:49, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 12/29/21 07:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 29/12/2021 16:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
> >> `/usr`. The move is already under way in rpm-ostree-based
> >>
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Tom Hughes via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I don't see how this is FHS compliant, which in turn would make
> it non-compliant with Fedora Packaging Guidelines, namely:
>
>
I am in agreement here and think that this is NOT a change to be made in
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Can someone shed light on the status of python-gevent in EL9? It seems
> to have been built for CS9:
>
> https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3414
>
> (though perhaps not tagged?)
>
> but builds for EPEL9 fail to
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 06:29, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Two packages I built for EPEL 9 are now reported by koschei as having
> missing build dependencies.
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/davix?collection=epel9
>
>
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 23:32, Reon Beon via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Update?
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
I am going to be overly blunt here. Messages like this do NOT help.
1. Most of the people who are paid to work on this are on break for 1/2
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I set up a rawhide cloud image
> (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64.qcow2 from
> download.fedoraproject.org) with a root password using virt-sysprep:
>
> virt-sysprep -a --root-password password:123456
>
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:16, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem".
> > If you use, for example, some shiny, new features that are only going
> > to be in GCC 12 or
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 05:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > - epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to
> >bootstrap on new EL releases
>
> Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 18:26, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>
> Am 15.12.21 um 00:24 schrieb Chris Adams:
> > I'm starting to look at CentOS 9-stream... what is the CRB repo? It
> > appears to be a lot of development libraries and such, but I didn't see
> > a definition or "CRB" anywhere.
>
>
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 22:20, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:40:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > It is a fairly manual process where a person volunteers to sit in
> > front of the firehose every day and deal with these requests. The
> > p
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 09:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have two questions regarding epel9:
>
> 1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours
> ago. E.g.
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
> Is it manual process? Or is the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 06:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8 for
> >> EPEL9. I have a
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 11:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:29 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>> We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue 136[1]
>> regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground.
>>
>> Looking through the logs we see that there are still people
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 14:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FsVerityRPM
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Enable the use of fsverity for installed RPM files validation.
>
> == Owners ==
>
> * Name: [[User:Dcavalca|Davide Cavalca]], [[User:Borisb|Boris
> Burkov]],
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 23:43, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
>
>
> I am trying to understand PAM, I have not used it before.
>
>
>
> When I open /etc/pam.d/system-auth, it has these lines:
>
> # This file is auto-generated.
>
> # User changes will be destroyed the next time authselect is
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 14:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Any plans to add EL 9 to the list of test instances?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
>
Could you please put in a ticket to
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue so it can be worked
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 06:08:49PM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> > Broadly speaking, fs-verity makes it possible to ensure that files that
> > were installed via an RPM have not been modified. It is useful in
> > environments
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > Could we set up open-source Gitlab and run that? Well, history has
> shown that the answer is "probably not, actually".
>
> I don't believe it. If GNOME and KDE and freedesktop.org and Debian and
> Purism can all do it, I'm pretty
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 15:05, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I mentioned on devel list that Sourcegraph is going to be indexing
> source.fedoraproject.org.
>
> So I guess, first — heads-up! if you see their traffic, it's not malicious.
> (I asked them to provide us with the user agent they use, and
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello EPEL people,
>
> what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for
> EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
>
I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes
should have a small stable
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 07:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
> wrote:
> >
> > I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is
> > an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or make
> > a custom website
Without knowing what kind of network, what kind of workload etc.. the
answer is 'no idea'. In most cases, you are going to have to make this
sort of judgement yourself and in the end, if it is off and you needed
it because some weird network or bluetooth keyboard acts like a
modem.. then you can
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 12:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > I was talking to a software vendor about there install instructions using
> > yum instead of dnf for EL 8 and he took the feedback back to the
> > development team but the response
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 15:10 Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 16.11.2021 um 20:37 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
> >
> > On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> >> == Owner ==
> >> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> >> * Email:
> >
> > May
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 10:04, Simon Matter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 09:18, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> >>
> >> Another option is to migrate to an RHEL 8 -compatible OS, like Rocky
> >> Linux, AlmaLinux, Oracle Linux, Springdale Linux.
> >>
> >> (I remind that CentOS Stream is no more a
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 09:18, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
> Another option is to migrate to an RHEL 8 -compatible OS, like Rocky
> Linux, AlmaLinux, Oracle Linux, Springdale Linux.
>
> (I remind that CentOS Stream is no more a RHEL 8 twin.)
>
> I have already migrated successfully all my CentOS 8
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 at 17:48, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> I started looking at 9-stream a bit... and I notice there are no package
> modules. All the things that were modules in 8/8-stream appear to have
> been folded back into the base OS, with no variants included (like
> different versions of
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 11:10, Manuel Wagesreither wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> sorry, wall of text incoming.
>
> tl;dr:
> If recipes install directories with `install -d path/to/dir`, how is the
> default mode determined? What can cause it suddenly (that is, without
> updating metalayers or
For full details on the problems please see
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
synopsis: z15 move failed, we are still on z13?/z14? until next week
or so when this will be tried again.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 06:55, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Now they're back up and running
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:47, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I requested a CentOS 8 Stream server from IT at $DAYJOB, but it's not IT
> approved, so they gave me a RHEL 8.2 instance. Well fine, I don't need their
> support but whatever...
>
> I went to enable EPEL per the docs[1]:
>
> $ sudo dnf
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote:
>
> > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
> > > I've
> > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder
> > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
>
> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 13:39, Stephen John Smoogen ()
> escribió:
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
> Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated'
> and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no
> keyword.
> I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 04:32, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:43:02AM -, Daniel Alley wrote:
> > Another issue - which is not per-se a security issue but it's still a
> > problem - is that deltarpm uses md5 checksums pervasively. They're
> > everywhere. And it uses
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 13:44, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote:
> > Deltarpm did
> > reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007
>
>
> I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
> I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 05:17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 11/8/21 01:23, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> >> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> >> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 00:16, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
>
> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a
> lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses.
> So
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 09:42, edmond pilon wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have a GTX 1080 and 495.44 drivers.
> The crash happens just after the same warning as you.
> I'm running the 5.15 rc6 kernel without issue.
> The boot problems started since 5.15 rc7 upgrade , and the only
1 - 100 of 4483 matches
Mail list logo
