Thomas,
I'm seeing the below log entries in assp:
Encountered a 500 error
An error has been encountered in accessing this page.
1. Server: assp.sourceforge.net
2. URL path: /cgi-bin/assp_griplist
3. Error notes: End of script output before
Thomas,
I've started seeing the below errors in my logs today. Reviewing
further back, it started on the 23rd.
26-04-2023 04:47:40 [Worker_1] AdminInfo: level-2-TLDlist download
failed: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
26-04-2023 04:47:40 [Worker_1] AdminInfo: level-3-TLDlist download
On 12/31/21 9:24 AM, Dirk Kulmsee wrote:
sourceforge.net and got an answer, thus DNS not failing.
Now I understand!
Doug
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
On 12/31/21 7:25 AM, Dirk Kulmsee wrote:
sourceforge.net.146 IN A 204.68.111.105
Dirk,
As far as I an aware, sourceforge.net does not provide a public DNS.
Doug
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> Sorry to bother you but it seems that the http repository on sourceforge
>>> for assp.pl is not updated (18 Aug 2021)
Davide,
I belive Thomas uses Sourceforge for stable releases and only gets updated
periodically.
Doug
___
Assp-test mailing
On 10/3/21 7:53 PM, K Post wrote:
Thanks Doug. How long does it take to start the rebuild SpamDB worker
though? Mine also runs 11, and seemingly fine, it just takes a
long time to start. I don't know why it starts before the GUI or
SMTP, but suspect that it needs to be running if it's
>>> I've been messing around (I don't think I broke anything), but at command
>>> line "starting rebuild SpamDB worker thread" sits for 3+ minutes.
Kevin,
Restarting my install shows
Starting rebuild SpamDB worker thread [10001] - ThreadCycleTime is set to 30
microseconds
I'm running under
>> Summary question: is there a way to immediately ban IP's that try SMTP auth
>> on a specific port, but not on other ports? Allow SMTP auth on listenPort2,
>> but immediately ban any IP that fails SMTP auth on port 25?
I don't think that is currently an option with ASSP, but I currently do
I tested this under Linux.
Copied an old email to resend at 11:54am
It was resent at 11:56am
Doug
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Thanks Thomas, none of their DNS entries show the incoming IP Address.
I went back to keeping a list of addresses. On a positive note, it appears
they only have 2 addresses. Once I cleared the SPFCache, the inbound checks
passed.
Doug
___
First about my system:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Devuan
Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 2.1 (ascii)
perl -v
This is perl 5, version 24, subversion 1 (v5.24.1) built for
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
(with 90 registered patches, see perl -V for more
Running under Devuan ascii.
I have a user that is getting falsified fedex.com email. The ASSP
analyzer is throwing red flags everywhere.
User is a SPAMLOVER, but with filter rules that move anything tagged
with spam to move to the junk folder, but this version of ASSP is not
tagging as
On 6/27/20 8:17 AM, K Post wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this?
I'm not, all 535 messages are from outside my home network.
Searching for unauthenticated results in no hits.
This, though is only a small setup for my home mail server.
Doug
___
>>> Interesting idea Doug. Do any of your users happen to get any SurveyMonkey
>>> notifications? These are sent to the owners of surveys. I'm curious if
>>> you're seeing the same malformed info in the headers.
I'm no longer with that company and do not recall,
Doug
This is not a necessarily resolution, but possibly a workaround for you.
In a past life, I've had some mail servers that just caused more issues then
they were worth, so I ended up identifying their mail server(S) range of IP
Addresses and placed those in an alias on the firewall and did a NAT
On 12/8/19 7:11 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Is there anyone else, who needs permanently to show authentication
information multiple times in unsecured plain text?
At a previous employer and currently on my home mail server, I generate
Authentication Failure reports daily. And like Mr. Post, I
Daniel,
The contents that are marked REDACTED are strings that look to be internally
generated by ASSP. Sorta like an MD5SUM.
Doug
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
On 4/22/19 12:07 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote:
Do I need to add anything to smtpDestinationSSL - even though I'm not
using listenPortSSL?
My TLS and SSL settings below. Just to also make sure, that your DNS
destination matches your certificate. For example, smtp.yourdomain.com
On 4/21/19 10:51 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote:
cert.pem is used for SSLCertFile
privkey.pem is used for SSLKeyFile
fullchain.pem is used for SSLCAFile
I am doing this as well.
Since moving to LetsEncrypt, I haven't had issues with SSL/TLS on ASSP
Doug
On 4/4/19 12:13 PM, K Post wrote:
Hi Doug,
Haven't heard from in a while Hope all is well!
I've been around, lurking, but no longer manage an ASSP installation,
other then my home system.
I don't think that'll work for our environment. We see tons of jpgs
as attachments / embedded in
Depending on the size of the client,
I temporarily would ban jpg and jpeg. I would announce company wide as to why.
I'd have them stored in the quarantine folder for daily review
On a valid blocked email, I would discuss with the recipient
Doug
On 4/1/19 4:42 PM, James Moe via Assp-test wrote:
Two EHLO responses are show below. The first is the response through
ASSP from port 587. The second is the response directly from port 587.
STARTTLS is missing from the response through ASSP!
Why are they different?
What settings affect
>>> starting 5 communication worker threads .Thread 6 terminated
>>> abnormally: error: AsspSelfLoader is unable to load code from file
>>> /opt/assp/sl-cache/main-ThreadStart.sl - Too many open files
>>> After that assp.cfg is scrambled again, containing values like
>>>
On 07/01/2018 07:08 AM, James Brown via Assp-test wrote:
Does any have a good fail2ban filter for ASSP?
I have this filter:
/# Fail2Ban filter for Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Server also known as ASSP/
I had to change the logging format in ASSP to get fail2ban to work,
please modify to your
On 07/01/2018 07:31 AM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Date/Time Format in LogDate /(LogDateFormat)/
That didn't work well. The format for date:
DD-MM- hh:mm:ss
Doug
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
I currently have ASSP to download new versions, but I manually install them.
Reviewing the download directory today shows the current assp.pl of 652 bytes?
The time stamp was Feb 13, 20:40 EST; examining the contents show:
SourceForge
https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.0.min.js";>
>>> Is there something I can adjust to have the "true" external sender IP
>>> and the attempt login name exposed in my mail server logs?
I run fail2ban on the ASSP server and it drops the connections
Doug
--
Check out
I'm receiving reports of email failures from rackspace.com. Their SPF record
is HUGE, but passes testing from mxtoolbox.com and kitterman.com testing tools,
I've temporarily had to use SPF override to accept all mail from them. Is this
a bug?
The logs are showing:
19-07-2017 14:37:47
>>> but I don't know how to implement immediate blocking after multiple
>>> different IPs fail.
I should elaborate a little.
I don't track ASSP logs for failures of any particular email address, I look
for any auth failures on a per IP Address basis and ban accordingly
Doug
[assp_auth_failure]
# Ignore failures on our local networks
ignoreip = 127.0.0.1 172.21.0.0/16 192.168.0.0/16 10.0.0.0/24
enabled = true
port = smtp,ssmtp
filter = assp_auth_failure
action = iptables-multiport[name=ASSP_AUTH, port="25,587", protocol=tcp]
>>> My initial reaction to this was "cool idea!", but then I thought about the
>>> implications to valid users.
I currently do this with Fail2Ban with an expire time.
Doug
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on
>>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 2:39 PM, support supp...@drdos.info wrote:
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> Would setting it to 2, 3 or even 4 be of help?
> At least 3 would be required. So we can see, if there is a renegotiating
> problem.
> Thomas,
> I have a Postfix loglevel 3 on a TLS timeout, would you
On 02/05/2017 09:50 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> At the end - is this really a problem?
Yes; non-executable file type should not have it's execute bit set.
Scripts and programs, yes, but not the .bak nor .txt or even the .db
Code accidentally or maliciously being entered would run.
Just my
On 02/05/2017 06:34 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> fixed in assp 2.5.6 build 17036:
Thomas,
I've just noted that in build 2.5.6(17026) under Linux, ASSP is setting
the execute bit on all files in the ASSP directory.
Doug
On 01/22/2017 08:06 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> As long as you provide the certificate(s) and privat key(s) in PEM
> format, this should be possible.
>
> Thomas
>
Indeed it does,
Thanks Thomas!
Doug
--
Check out the
Hey guys,
I just followed and setup LetsEncrypt SSL Certificates for my Zimbra
mail server following the below link:
https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?f=15=60781
I wanted to know if this could also be used for SSL/TLS communications
with ASSP?
We have problems with our MACs not liking
On 12/23/2016 07:49 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> The GUI got a new design. ASSP will try to download and to install the
> updates contained in the images folder.
Thomas,
I've just installed the new version of ASSP on my home system and I just
LOVE the re-designed GUI!
Thanks for all you do for
>>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:20 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Doug,
>>> So you're seeing this too! Did it just start this morning?
Yes and that it did.
Doug
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of
>>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> organizations (some really big ones too) are seeing this on their mail
>>> systems this morning too.
I took the hammer approach and temporarily put it in the blocked attachment
list.
Doug
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Doug,
>
> please download and test ass.pl from
>
> http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp2/test/
>
> tell me if it works.
Thomas,
This fixed the issue.
Doug
--
Find and fix
Thomas,
I'll have to do that after hours. I'll put it into place tonight and report
then.
Thank for looking into this!
Doug
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications
>> Do you use any symlink, hardlink or network filesystem for the 'logs'
>> folder or the files?
No sir.
And,
Reverting back to 16080 fixes the issue.
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with
I guess it does not.
Just a side note, to be able to get Fail2Ban to work, I've changed the default
log format to:
DD-MM- hh:mm:ss
Doug
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications
Yes.
Hopefully the list supports small images:
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> set 'ReportLog' to diagnostic - post the log the request.
>
>
11-04-2016 05:12:09 [Main_Thread] Admin connection from user root on
host 192.168.200.2:51415; page:/;
session-ID:149029aec879d1ac7fb25f35c1720f67;
11-04-2016 05:12:09 [Main_Thread] AdminUpdate: [root
I had time to upgrade ASSP from 16080 to ASSP version 2.5.2(16100)
today, running on Debian Wheezy.
When I send an email to blockreport@assp.local requesting a report for
the last 5 days, from an account that I know has blocked email I get:
no blocked email found in the last 5 day(s)
lines
Thomas,
I'm currently running ASSP on a Debian Virtual Machine using flat files.
I've got scripts in place that, when I do a snapshot for backups, I TERM
the assp process, get the snapshot and then restart ASSP.
This morning, I've moved this to MySQL for my databases.
My questions is, Does
>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> fixed in assp 2.5.2 build 16083:
Block reports are still broken under this build, returning to 16080 brings them
back.
Doug
>> It would also appear that block reports are broken.
Reverting back to 16080 fixed this.
Doug
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration
>> my mistake - what else!?
It would also appear that block reports are broken.
Ran a report for someone that I saw had several spams in the last 2 days and
the report came back as:
no blocked email found in the last 2 day(s)
lines with 0.0B analysed in logfiles on host assp.ourdomain.inet
>>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
>>> Use the right tool for the job...
>>> In this case, fail2ban (or something like it) is what you need.
I agree with Charles here and I use fail2ban for these occurrences.
Doug
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Doug, what is your setting of 'OutgoingBufSizeNew' ?
>>> Thomas
The default: 1024
Doug
--
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> Would setting it to 2, 3 or even 4 be of help?
> At least 3 would be required. So we can see, if there is a renegotiating
> problem.
Thomas,
I have a Postfix loglevel 3 on a TLS timeout, would you like me to send
the archive directly to you? It's 165KB compressed.
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Doug, please upgrade IO::Socket::SSL to the latest version (possibly also
> Net::SSLeay) and tryout the latest assp v2 dev build.
> Tell me if the issue (timeouts) is gone.
Thanks Thomas,
I'm on vacation starting Monday and will put those into place and let
you know.
I found some time this AM to upgrade our work ASSP:
ASSP version 2.4.6(15351)
IO::Socket::SSL 2.022 / 2.020
Net::SSLeay 1.72 / 1.72
I've had 30 timeouts in the last hour
I'm planning on doing a TCP dump on my home mail server this upcoming Monday
(running Zimbra at work
>>> On Dec 18, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
>>> wrote:
>>>I've had 30 timeouts in the last hour
bad news! Thank you for testing.
Postfix manual for TLS logging gives:
Server-side TLS activity logging
To get additional information about Postfix SMTP server
I am running ASSP version 2.4.6(15334) on Debian GNU/Linux 7.9 (wheezy),
Perl version:
perl -v
This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 0 (v5.18.0) built for
x86_64-linux-thread-multi
I've noted that when ASSP's 'do TLS' module is enabled on port 25, I get
lots of SMTP timeouts, when it's only
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> What about making a symlink in /usr/bin/perl to /usr/local/bin/perl ?
This makes more sense,
Thank you for the suggestion, I'll do that.
Doug
--
___
>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:39 AM, anders westin anders.wes...@dometic.com wrote:
>>> is it possible to "lock" a incoming mail address to a certain ip address
What I would probably do is to verify if they have a valid SPF record and if
so, set their domain to SPF Strict.
If they do not, then
>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Switch on debugging for such mails.
>>> debugRe: automated_email\@dell\.com
Debugging turned on and test quote sent. The email address and domain name
have been modified to prevent spam.
Maybe someone can suggest a way for me to diagnose the below problem.
I've noted for a few months now, that when receiving an automated confirmation
email from Dell, that I don't receive them on our Zimbra mail server.
Reviewing the logs show that the email was received, the email domain was
Thanks for taking the time to Look Thomas, I'll look into the Zimbra side of
things.
Doug
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:00 PM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to have Log RE email the full line in the log which
I just turned this on the other day. Edit the /assp/lib/CorrectASSPcfg.pm
file. Uncomment:
$main::AUTHLogUser = 1;# (0/1) write the
I'm currently running ASSP version 2.4.6(15162) under Debian GNU/Linux 7.8
(wheezy) with Perl:
perl -v
This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
(with 89 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
I've noted problems with email coming in
I just checked my ASSP download folder to find an assp.pl file that
contained the below:
We're sorry -- the Sourceforge site is currently in Disaster Recovery
mode, and currently requires
the use of javascript to function. Please check back later.
Interesting,
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
K Post wrote:
I can't figure this out to save my life. Is there something wrong with the
regex? If external is set to level 2 and block, how would mails like this
I didn't have reg in my list, but added it just for a test and it was
blocked. My setup below:
ASSP version 2.4.4(15004)
On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Christian Leicht use...@schani.com wrote:
Yes, but from Gmail you cant get a answer (since 14 Days) ;-((
Check to see if you're on a blacklist:
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
I am in the same internal lan as my ASSP and Mailserver.
And that's where we differ.
Internal to our network, I've not experienced this, only when connected
remotely.
Doug
--
Dive into the World of Parallel
Hi,
since a few weeks I have to restart assp two times a day.
Sending mails seems to be blocked by assp.
I've had the same issue, the only way I've worked around it is to either:
1.) Restart ASSP (Only works for a few hours)
2.) Run OpenVPN and point the outgoing SMTP directly to the
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Doug,
there is no code in the current assp.pl that calls 'matchSL' with the
parameter 'noScanIP'. This was the case in some versions before assp 2.2.2
build 12218.
Thomas,
I created a new Virtual Machine (Copy of the original ASSP), I deleted
the contents of the /assp
Does anyone know if this headers are written by ASSP?
*Virus Detected:* 'Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.6890.UNOFFICIAL'
*Full Header:*
ClamAV with the SaneSecurity signatures reports back to ASSP and ASSP adds it
to the headers.
Doug
this was a bug in 2.2.2 and was solve in assp 2.2.2 build 12218 and
ASSP_AFC version 2.05
Thanks Thomas!
Doug
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month
this was a bug in 2.2.2 and was solve in assp 2.2.2 build 12218 and
ASSP_AFC version 2.05
I guess I'm lost, I just noted the version number.
I'm on 2.4.4 (15004)
Doug
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New
Does this mean the senders in question are still in NoProcessingDomains?
In this particular case, the 'sender' was my mail server. It was sending the
nightly postfix report to me. For some reason, it would randomly match against
either lists.digium.com or mythtv.org.
Those domains are still
If you feel more comfortable, change the option back to (
file:files/noscanav.txt) :):)
It wasn't effecting anybody but me. I'll revert my changes when I get home
tonight.
Doug
--
New Year. New Location. New
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
After moving the 2 IP addresses out of the web interface and into a file
configuration - following these steps:
1 - look in to the folder: files/optRE and find the file 'noScanIPs.txt'
2 - make a backup of this file
3 - now change the config back to plain IP - take
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
noScanIP
I can't reproduce this issue - it works for me.
After moving the 2 IP addresses out of the web interface and into a file
(file:files/noscanav.txt), this problem went away.
After removing @lists.digium.com|@mythtv.org from No Processing
Addresses (NoProcessing)
I'm running ASSP on Debian 7.7 (wheezy) on the current ASSP release.
I've specified that IP address 10.10.10.250 should not be scanned
because some times the SaneSecurity signatures are triggered on my daily
reports. Today, I just noted that I haven't seen a report in a couple
days and
Mr. Courtney Creighton wrote:
I haven't yet devised how to properly test the software theory, but
anecdotally, I've only heard complaints about this from my Thunderbird
users, and not Outlook/OE/Mail users.
Can I ask what MTA you're using behind ASSP?
I'm using Zimbra Version
James Brown wrote:
Dec-11-14 10:23:53 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7FAD1B6519F8 127.0.0.1:51769
127.0.0.1:25 127.0.0.1:10026
Dec-11-14 10:23:56 [Worker_2] 127.0.0.1 info: authentication - plain is used
You've got a compromised account on your system. The sender authenticated.
A failed
Mr. Courtney Creighton wrote:
If you come up with anything better, I'd love to hear it. Soon, I want
to disable all user logins via unencrypted protocols, and it would be
really nice to have more reliable secure connections to go with that.
I'm not 100% sure it isn't the ISP causing the issue.
James Brown wrote:
[spam found] (HMM) [New Arrival Love Get Your Summer Eyewear] -
/Applications/assp/spam/1073.eml;
Running ASSP 2.4.4(14336), Perl is 5.018002
Am I missing something, or is there a bug that was introduced in 14336?
I've seen this as well, but before 14336.
Doug
--
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
- fixes a thrown exception
Prototype mismatch: sub Net::SMTP::assp_starttls (-1) vs none at sub
Net::SMTP::assp_starttls line 28.
I was hoping this would address my SMTP STARTTLS problem, unfortunately
it did not.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote:
your MTA does not answer after it got the
The MTA (Postfix) shows:
Dec 1 07:45:13 web postfix/smtpd[31547]: 72E162008D7CD:
client=assp.drdos.info[10.10.10.247], sasl_method=PLAIN,
Maybe I need to read up on tcpdump.
trace the connection between the client and assp.
The client being the end user or the Mail Server?
If the end user, this is happening on all of them, including my test laptop on
a MiFi wireless service. If that's the case, maybe it's my firewall. I'm
Everybody,
I've been having issues with remote users not being able to send email
using STARTTLS with SeaMonkey as the MUA on port 587, for the last
couple months.
The symptoms are:
User goes to send email
SeaMonkey's status bar indicates email is in the process of being sent.
It then just
Little bit about my system:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 7.6 (wheezy)
Release:7.6
Codename: wheezy
perl -v
This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 0 (v5.18.0) built for
x86_64-linux-thread-mult
SPF module
Doug Lytle wrote:
Little bit about my system:
Missed the most important part:
ASSP version 2.4.4(14273)
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email
Doug Lytle wrote:
Missed the most important part:
ASSP version 2.4.4(14273)
Please ignore, we've tracked down the failure.
Thanks,
Doug
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9
Colin wrote:
Do you recall what you did to resolve it then?
I never did.
People were starting to get the perception that our mail server was
having issues, having it down so much trying to figure this out, so I
left it alone for almost 8 months. Figured I'd give it another try.
I'll be
Fritz Borgstedt (15. April 1945 - 8. Mai 2014) is no longer with us
Oh my gosh! I didn't even know he was ill!
Doug
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium
Alessandro Cattani wrote:
MaxAuthErrors is set to 10
My MTA is Mailenable v. 8.01
So, how can I block these connections?
I would suggest you contact Mailenable's support and have them fix their
response, it looks to be broken:
https://www.mailenable.com/support/step1.asp
Doug
--
Ben
I'm not sure how to block these as btinternet.com publishes no SPF
You can use spf override and create them a SPF record in ASSP, then use SPF
strict.
I believe there are examples in the ASSP GUI.
Doug
--
WatchGuard
What determines if a link is supposed to be generated vs just text?
Good question! I've noted this as well.
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing
Is it possible to reload redlist upon file change (automatically, or by
triggering a command)
killall -HUP assp.pl
Doug
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Is there a way to check if assp is running and if its not start
automatically.
I use monit to watch ASSP.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
However, I will have a thorough look at monit.
If you go that route, here is my config:
set mail-format {
from: assp.monit AT somedomain.com
subject: [Monit] $SERVICE $EVENT at $DATE
message: Monit $ACTION $SERVICE
Now you see in the header that the ASSP said the eMail is Whitelisted
because of the hp.com, but the (mhp.com) is in all
You need to make sure you have a @ in front of the hp.com, i.e. @hp.com
Doug
--
Learn the
Tim Evans wrote:
Neither one of these is in my local domains
...Tim
I'd suggest searching on one of those addresses in the ASSP 'View Mailog
Tail' option. Once it's highlighted, you can click on the entry and have
option to act on it.
Also, paste the address into the White/Redlist/Tuplets
Aug-26-13 11:12:58 40778-13666 [Worker_1] [InvalidLocalSender] 8.31.233.118
xx...@sasco.com [spam found] Spoofing Sender in Local Domain
This would indicate that the domain(s) in question is/are listed in your Local
Domains config file.
Doug
1 - 100 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
