Bug#1036077: please reassign to xserver

Since this seems to be a xserver problem, could you please reassign the ticket to the correct xserver package? *t

Re: add make-4.4.1 to experimental

Hi Ilari On 18.03.23 04:00, Ilari Jääskeläinen wrote: There is a new upstream release available. Please report your issue as a wishlist ticket. To do that do as root: apt install reportbug Then do as non-root: reportbug --severity=wishlist make Greetings, *t

Re: Consensus on closing old bugs

On 06.02.23 11:51, Santiago Vila wrote: El 6/2/23 a las 11:26, Brian Thompson escribió: I understand that the usual way to close out bug reports is having the original author do it themselves.  What's the policy on closing bug reports that haven't had activity in over 6 months? Let the

Re: loong64: dpkg modification patch

Hello Han Gao, I *think* it's better if you work "the standard Debian way". I.e. file a bug against dpkg with the reportbug tool, and attach the patch to the bug report. Thanks for the effort to support the loong architecture, *t On 20.12.22 01:26, Han Gao wrote: Hi, Guillem: refer the

allow users to install packages [was: Re: a two cent suggestion]

On 26.11.22 19:42, Patrice Duroux wrote: Dear Debian people, Already possible or not, I would like to have a Debian system for which packages can be installed either by a specific user (root/sysadmin as usual) only or by any other (or a group of) users. But this would also depend on the class

Re: The future of src:ntp

On 17.01.22 17:01, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: a couple of years ago (in 2017) I stepped up to help bring src:ntp back in shape because I needed it for work. All uploads since that time have been made by me. An RFH bug had been open the whole time and just recently got the first message for five

Re: Touchpad driver on Lenovo X13 Yoga has major use-stopping bugs

Hi G.W., I don't think the debian-devel mailing list is the right place to debug this. Debugging this will need going back and forth over logs etc. The best place to advance on this problem is to go the debian IRC channel https://wiki.debian.org/IRC and do the diagnosing interactively there.

Re: ungoogled-chromium?

On 08.12.21 08:27, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 7 December 2021 23:35 GMT, Simon McVittie: I believe what Vincent meant is that the generic non-Flatpak binaries provided by the "Ungoogled Chromium" project are compiled on unknown machines and require trusting their submitters, whereas the

ungoogled-chromium? [was: Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)]

On 06.12.21 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote: On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion about ending security support for

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 07.12.21 19:14, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:05:29PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: So you being a DD and soon at work on Chromium the hope was that maybe you could conduct some of upstream love to care about the world outside of Google (?), here in particular

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

Hi Steinar, On 07.12.21 10:07, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: I note that Steinar Gunderson [1] is now employed by Google to work on Chrome, so maybe there could be hope talking to him? It's right that I'm just joining

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 06.12.21 22:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: I have good experience with some of my upstreams where they supported me by adapting their build system to enable building without the bundled/vendored dependencies. Has this been tried? Would

Re: uscan roadmap

On 01.12.21 12:50, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Likewise, I would love if uscan could just learn how github, gitlab, launchpad, etc are made so prople won't have to bother with sticking urls into watchfiles, such as: Source: GitHub Source-Options: namespace: trendmicro project: tlsh

Re: Debian 11 Bullseye Setup Problems Error Report

G'day admin4, I suggest you take this to the #debian IRC channel where you can hopefully drill down to the root cause of the problem. A mailing list like debian-devel is not really well suited to do back-and-forth debugging... *t On 23.09.21 12:08, admin4 wrote: GoodDay Mates, network

Bug#993488: maybe reason for wontfix?

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993488#16 contains a "wontfix + close" but no rationale. Which leaves the original reporter with a large "?" I guess. I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how Unix works unfortunately" aka "that's a Unix design bug"?

Re: Package name misspelled in binNMU changelogs

On 25.08.21 15:23, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:19:34AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: >> Is there any reasonable way to get this spelling error corrected in the >> changelogs across all these packages? > As those are specifically binNMU changelogs, I don't think so. You

Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings

On 23.08.21 07:24, Tomas Pospisek wrote: On 23.08.21 02:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2021-08-21 10:36:04 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: In particular it *seems* to work for him and he doesn't have access to your system where things apparently went wrong so it could be really hard for him

Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings

On 23.08.21 02:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2021-08-21 10:36:04 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: In particular it *seems* to work for him and he doesn't have access to your system where things apparently went wrong so it could be really hard for him to know. So what you can do is to try to debug

Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]

On 23.08.21 02:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2021-08-22 23:32:15 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 08:25:41PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: Wouldn't the Bcc'ed email that arrived to the BTS be visible in the bug's log/archive (on the bug's page (https://bugs.debian.org

Re: merged /usr vs. symlink farms

On 22.08.21 00:11, Guillem Jover wrote: I'm personally just not seeing such consensus, despite the attempts of some to make it pass as so. My perception is that this topic has become such a black hole of despair, that people that take issue with it, are simply stepping away. Possibly. But for

BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]

Hi Mattia, On 21.08.21 12:06, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 10:36:04AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: Hi Vincent, On 20.08.21 16:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote: My bug report https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989734 has been closed again, with no explanations

Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings

Hi Vincent, On 20.08.21 16:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote: My bug report https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989734 has been closed again, with no explanations. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989734;msg=12 claims that the bug was closed via

Re: Q: Use https for {deb,security}.debian.org by default

On 21.08.21 09:14, Philipp Kern wrote: On 20.08.21 21:11, Russ Allbery wrote: The way I would put it is that the security benefit of using TLS for apt updates is primarily that it makes certain classes of attempts to mess with the update channel more noisy and more likely to produce immediate

Re: debhelper upstream should correct the perl from "use v5.24;" into "use v5.28;".

Hi Sérgio, On 27.05.21 13:14, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 20:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, debhelper-devel ML doesn't exist anymore, please let me know if I should report this in other place . I can't build debhelper on Centos epel 8, which have Perl 5.26.3 I forgot to

Re: Request for Pricing

On 07.05.21 17:29, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Hello Tony, I don't know where you got this mail address as a source for providing the goods you need, but it's not correct -- Debian is a volunteer organization that produces a distribution of the free "Linux" operating system. We cannot provide what you

Re: Expectation of constructive interaction

On 10.04.21 19:39, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Dear fellow Debian community members, We have been having two weeks of difficult and heated discussion. The level of conflict has escalated out of proportion, both within the project and outside. We remind everyone that you are expected to interact

Re: IBus emoji glitch

Hi Devops PK Carlisle LLC, please install the `reportbug` package and then open a terminal and type `reportbug ibus` and describe the problem there. That will make sure the problem can be seen and properly tracked by the `ibus` maintainers which might not be reading this list. *t On

Re: Package dependency versions and consistency

On 19.12.20 01:25, Josh Triplett wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2020-12-17 13:16:14) Even if you package everything, you will never ever have the right combination of version of the various packages. What is possible to auto-compute is a coarse view of the work

Re: Sample Small Organisation Server now has email

On 12.12.20 21:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: It was good that you introduced your project here on the d-devel@ list, but I suspect no all 2500 subscribers want to follow closely your detailed progress going forward. I'd prefer if the conversation stayed here. It's not like you are literaly

Re: crypto policy for Debian?

On 11.12.20 10:08, Timo Aaltonen wrote: I noticed that crypto-policies is packaged, but not really used anywhere. Would it be worthwhile to make it the official way to configure the system-wide crypto policy as it was implemented in Fedora [1]? This has been briefly mentioned before at least

Re: Bug#975111: ITP: webpackage -- WebPackage is a revolutionary way of distributing web apps.

On 20.11.20 14:41, Tomas Pospisek wrote: (same as ITP 975110) Does anybody know why recently there have been so many duplicate WNPP bugreports? It seems like a trend, however I have no clue why? Why have recently so many WNPP reports been submitted twice? The submitter has followed up

Re: Bug#975111: ITP: webpackage -- WebPackage is a revolutionary way of distributing web apps.

(same as ITP 975110) Does anybody know why recently there have been so many duplicate WNPP bugreports? It seems like a trend, however I have no clue why? Why have recently so many WNPP reports been submitted twice? *t On 19.11.20 07:25, Witherking25 wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist

Re: Split Packages files based on new section "buildlibs"

On 13.11.20 20:51, Wolfgang Silbermayr wrote: [...detailed explanation of why the buildlibs proposal for Rust is necessary...] Thanks a lot for the explanation Wolfgang! *t

Re: Split Packages files based on new section "buildlibs"

Hi Antonio (and anybody else that understands the technical problem involved here), I've been reading the whole thread and it seems to me that the reason, why Rust/Go build-time "libraries" need to be handled differently from all the other existing stuff in the world and that "no user ever

Re: Lenovo and forced labor [was: Re: Lenovo discount portal update (and a few other things)]

On 03.09.20 11:05, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:47:06AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> I think before jumping on this offer, one should consider this: >> https://www.aspi.org.au/report/uyghurs-sale > The list of brands from the article: Abercrombie &am

Lenovo and forced labor [was: Re: Lenovo discount portal update (and a few other things)]

On 02.09.20 15:08, Mark Pearson wrote: > Hi Debian developers, > > Following on from DebConf 2020 (which I thoroughly enjoyed - thank you!) > the Lenovo portal that was announced is now available: > > US: http://www.lenovo.com/us/en/Linux > Canada: http://www.lenovo.com/ca/en/linuxca I think

Re: Accepted firefox-esr 68.10.0esr-1~deb9u1 (source) into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates

Could you please send the original email *including* the headers (!!!) so that we know where your emails are coming from? *t On 06.08.20 17:31, arc...@tutanota.com wrote: > Could I please unsubscribe? Its filling up this mailbox there is no sort > function. > > -- > Securely sent with Tutanota.

Bug#967029: take the bug to irc/support channel?

Hello bebyx, could you please take this bug to a Debian support channel [1] (I suggest IRC!) and find out, what package this needs to be reassigned to? And maybe collect more info along the way? Thanks, *t [1] https://www.debian.org/support

Bug#962579: RFH: debtags -- Debian Package Tags support tools

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the debtags package. The package description is: debtags extracts tag information from the apt database and makes it available to the system, either in /var/lib/debtags/debtags or via apt-xapian-index. . Package tags are

Re: Running autopkgtest on porter boxes: dd-autopkgtest

On 31.05.20 22:40, Michael Banck wrote: > it's possible for DDs to build/test packages on porter boxes via > dd-schroot-cmd, see https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/. > > However, e.g. arm64 autopkgtest failures are RC bugs and so far, it was > difficult to reproduce and debug those on the porter

Re: Upload of package (Closes: #952788) in bug reports

On 28.05.20 18:44, Leandro Cunha wrote: > Close https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952788  > With several changes in the package. > > Em qui., 28 de mai. de 2020 às 12:52, Leandro Cunha > mailto:leandrocunha...@gmail.com>> escreveu: > > Can I help with uploading a package? I'm

Re: Packaging devel-only C++ library

On 27.05.20 21:16, Enrico Zini wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to package a new version of https://github.com/ARPA-SIMC/meteosatlib, > for which I'm upstram, which depends on the recently freed > https://gitlab.eumetsat.int/open-source/PublicDecompWT > > PublicDecompWT is a C++ development-only

Re: Salsa update: no more "-guest" and more

On 30.04.20 01:15, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > On 4/28/20 3:20 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> That's not the case. An MITM attack could gain a session and maintain it >> open, while the end user would just notice "oh shit, I miss-typed the >> 2FA numbers, let's try again". Then the only thing the

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On 09.04.20 08:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: > As a user, I'd prefer Kubernets to be in Stable if possible. I'd be one > of these users who don't care about the latest shiny feature, and prefer > something stable, supported for YEARS to come, not just 3 months. To give a datapoint: Kubernetes as a

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On 25.03.20 15:19, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:14:41PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> On 25.03.20 14:43, Christian Kastner wrote: >> >>> This is not to say that licensing is an unimportant issue -- it clearly >>> is. But our anal

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On 25.03.20 14:43, Christian Kastner wrote: > This is not to say that licensing is an unimportant issue -- it clearly > is. But our analyze-and-document down-to-the-file approach is on the > other extreme end of the spectrum, and it causes lots of tiresome work > that nobody apart from us seems

Re: Repeated Debian WiFi problem

On 22.03.20 10:47, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 02:20:18 -0700, Peter Pynchon > wrote: > >> *In future Debian versions, could you please include the ASUS driver in the >> standard package?* *The model number is the ASUS N53 USB WiFi adapter with >> the rt3572 chip.* I see on your

Re: trimming changelogs

On 20.03.20 00:50, Adam Borowski wrote: > In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase [...] > [trim changelogs] I don't know man minbase is, so I don't know what you are talking about. On a normal desktop/server I'd expect /usr/share/doc/$PKG/changelog.Debian* to contain the whole

rereadmin the ln manpage

On 17.03.20 15:48, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Yes. I keep messing that up in production (ln is one of those commands > that I continually need to read the man page of) I suggest the `tldr` command for that... *t

Re: RFC: Replacing vim-tiny with nano in essential packages

On 16.03.20 12:29, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 16, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> `busybox vi` is rather limited, but is reasonable as an editor of last >> resort; busybox is smaller than either nano or vim-tiny; full systems > Agreed: this is a very good idea since I really think that every

Re: RFC: Replacing vim-tiny with nano in essential packages

On 16.03.20 11:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I would like to suggest to replace vim-tiny with nano as the default minimal > editor installed with debootstrap and therefore debian-installer. +1

Re: FTP Team -- call for volunteers

On 14.03.20 22:41, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 09:18:48PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: >> Hi debian-project and ftpmaster folks, >> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 01:37:59PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >>> - cope well with flames in response to your decisions >> >>> - after

documenting on how not starting a daemon upon installation

> On Sun, 8 Mar 2020, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 21:30:33 +0100, Tomas Pospisek > > >When I duckduckgo "dpkg do not start service on install" first hit is > >[1] which contains /absurdly involved/ suggestions to achieve "not > >st

Re: not starting a daemon upon installation

On 07.03.20 21:30, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > tldr: why is not having a daemon started on install so involved? Can't > there be a better way? to which Jonas, Marco & jnqnfe replied (see thread). Thanks a lot Jonas, Marco & jnqnfe! *t

Re: apt 2.0 release notes

On 08.03.20 19:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Matthias Klose (2020-03-08 18:40:34) >> On 3/7/20 9:41 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >>> # APT 2.0 >>> >>> After brewing in experimental for a while, and getting a first outing in >>> the Ubuntu 19.10 release; both as 1.9, APT 2.0 is now

not starting a daemon upon installation

Hi all, tldr: why is not having a daemon started on install so involved? Can't there be a better way? I'm hacking around an ansible playbook that needs to configure an etcd cluster. The problem is that installing the package will automatically start the daemon cluster in a "default"

Re: spammer closing bug report

On 02.03.20 21:34, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > Hi, > >> Most likely it has been BCC'ed, that's what spammers like to do when >> they send the same mail to thousands of recipients. >> > > Indeed, this can be seen by clicking on "full text" here in the bug report: > --- > Reply sent to nore...@no.com:

Re: spammer closing bug report

On 02.03.20 18:06, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2020-03-02 17:20 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > >> I just got a mail from the BTS, that this spam mail [1] has closed the >> bug report. I can't spot why that spam mail would close the report. Can you? > > Without even lookin

spammer closing bug report

Hi all, I just got a mail from the BTS, that this spam mail [1] has closed the bug report. I can't spot why that spam mail would close the report. Can you? Possibly other bugreports have been closed by similar spams, I don't know (this - BTS cleaning - would still be an area I'd like to get

Re: requirements and regulations concerning upgrade checks/statistics callback on program start

On 26.12.19 06:42, Norbert Preining wrote: > (please Cc) > > are there any requirements or restriction what a program packaged in > Debian is allowed to do when starting up? Calibre is normally doing the > following checks: > - check for updates of itself > - check for updates of plugins > -

Re: Summary: Git Packaging Round 2 [comments by 11/05/2019]

Hi Sam & Debianistas, this is far TLDR for me. That is not meant as a critique, but as a feedback so you have a data point from some random Debianer's available CPU resources. (in general I'm fine to declare best practices for whatever issue so that people can orient themselves on where to head

Re: Init systems and docker

Hi Debianistas! Am 12.10.19 um 01:06 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 18:49 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I have had bugs filed against more than one package I maintain regarding >> issues >> with sysv init scripts when used in docker. >> >> I have been told by docker users

Re: help

Am 15.08.19 um 21:09 schrieb seydi mouhamadou moustapha ndiaye: > I'm a student in computer engineering field from africa and I look for a > mentor who can  help me to accurate my computer skills mainly on coding. Learn by doing. Install Debian on your laptop. Then pick a package you like or

Re: Please stop hating on sysvinit (was Re: do packages depend on lexical order or {daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?)

Am 07.08.19 um 19:00 schrieb Marc Haber: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:44:01 +0100, Ian Jackson > wrote: >> Marc Haber writes ("Re: do packages depend on lexical order or >> {daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?"): >>> We have already thrown sysvinit away. >> >> No, we have not. > > We have given up on

Bug#932769: [moreinfo] DoS via DHCP request

ave any questions. On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:23 PM Tomáš Pospíšek wrote: Am 23.07.19 um 17:57 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 16:51 -0400, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> Package: general >> Followup-For: Bug #932769 >> >> Cou

Bug#931296: general: Camera flash drive mount does not show up on desktop

Package: general Followup-For: Bug #931296 Hi Roger, Roger wrote: > Plugging in camera in Buster does not show flash storage on desktop as > it did in previous versions with Xfce DE. There was no reply to this bug report. The problem is, that debugging this involves some work, which you need

Re: Comparing/Using Conda with Debian

Am 11.07.19 um 06:53 schrieb Steffen Möller: > On an project-internal mailing list the thread "Conda vs Debian" > [etc.] What's Conda? *t

Re: Notes on packaging PCYNLITX

Hi, I have a few rather higher level questions about PCYNLITX. * are there any known users of PCYNLITX, in the sense of, does there exist an application, that actually uses PCYNLITX? * I have read through the web page of PCYNLITX. I can not make up my mind. The web page is talking about how

Bug#932769: [moreinfo] DoS via DHCP request

-dhcp-client? [...]?): shouldn't there be some rate limiting sanity check in the DHCP client? *t On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Tomas Pospisek wrote: Package: general Followup-For: Bug #932769 Could you privide a recipe on how to reproduce this? There's a lot of very special setup below, that someone

Bug#932769: [moreinfo] DoS via DHCP request

Package: general Followup-For: Bug #932769 Could you privide a recipe on how to reproduce this? There's a lot of very special setup below, that someone wwould need large amounts of time to reporoduce I feel. Is it possible to reduce the problem to something easily demonstratable? This seems to

Re: Let's consider using year based release identifiers [was: Re: getting rid of "testing"]

Hi, Am 29.06.19 um 23:32 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > On 6/29/19 3:33 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> Am 29.06.19 um 15:28 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 01:53:35PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >>>> TLDR; year based release identi

Re: Let's consider using year based release identifiers [was: Re: getting rid of "testing"]

Am 29.06.19 um 15:28 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 01:53:35PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> TLDR; year based release identifiers should be prefered since they are >> much more intuitive to reason about than codenames and sequentialy >> numbere

Re: Let's consider using year based release identifiers [was: Re: getting rid of "testing"]

Am 29.06.19 um 14:41 schrieb Jeremy Stanley: > On 2019-06-29 13:53:35 +0200 (+0200), Tomas Pospisek wrote: > [...] >> As others here I am starting to get confused by the release code >> names, as are my peers that are not that much into Debian. And >> sequential release n

Let's consider using year based release identifiers [was: Re: getting rid of "testing"]

Am 25.06.19 um 08:08 schrieb Ansgar: > what do people think about getting rid of current suite names ("stable", > "testing", "unstable") for most purposes? We already recommend using > codenames instead as those don't change their meaning when a new release > happens. > > Related to that I

Bug#922712: general: Freezing on log-in screen when booting laptop on battery power

Hi, the main problem here is that you are reporting the problem against "general", since that will probably not lead to the bug being acted upon. "Hewlett Packard Pavilion g6 2239-sr reffered as "laptop" later after clean Debian stable install (with Xfce DE, but i assume it's not important

Re: Limiting the power of packages

On 3 Oct 2018 Lars Wirzenius wrote: > A suggestion: we restrict where packages can install files and what maintainer scripts can do. On 4 Oct 2018 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Finally, I'd really like to reduce complexity, not introduce even more. +1 I think Linux systems per se, Debian as a

Accepted dia 0.97.3+git20160930-8 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:15:39 -0200 Source: dia Binary: dia-common dia Architecture: source Version: 0.97.3+git20160930-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Tomas Pospisek <tpo_...@sourcepole.ch> Changed-By:

Re: Q: How to get build depends package from debian/control

Am 12.02.2018 um 05:41 schrieb Yao Wei: > [...] I'd prefer mk-build-deps from devscripts since this > produces pseudo-package that depends on the build dependencies, and the > dependencies can be removed by removing the pseudo-package. Whoa, what a gem, I did not know existed! Just what I was

Re: Bug#875545: ITP: cpdf -- The tool provide a wide range of professional, robust tools to modify PDF files.

Am 15.09.2017 um 04:22 schrieb Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro: >> If this is your first package to Debian, for a variety of reasons I >> don't recommend packaging something that will go to non-free. > > Yes, this would be my first package, I understood that it is > inappropriate to initially

Re: Improvement of sensible-utils

Am 11.08.2017 um 18:37 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: > Hi, > > I have done some work for sensible-utils but I am a little stuck due > to lack of documentation/policy. > > I want first to create desktop file for > sensible-editor/sensible-pager/sensible-browser in order to open from > firefox text

Re: Qupzilla Deb-stretch x86_64

Please install the package reportbug and use reportbug to report the bug. *t Am 28.04.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Fungi4All: > --- Please fill out the fields below. --- > >Package name: qupzilla > Version: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/538.1 > (KHTML, like$ > Upstream Author:

Re: convention on listen port local or all network interfaces etc.

Am 23.02.2017 um 03:26 schrieb Patrick Schleizer: > Tomas Pospisek: >> Am 21.02.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Patrick Schleizer: >> >>> for file_name in /usr/lib/server-config.d/*.conf ; do >>>file_list="$file_list $file_name" >>> done >&

Re: convention on listen port local or all network interfaces etc.

Am 21.02.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Patrick Schleizer: > for file_name in /usr/lib/server-config.d/*.conf ; do >file_list="$file_list $file_name" > done > > for file_name in /etc/server-config.d/*.conf ; do >file_list="$file_list $file_name" > done > > for file_name in

"Dear Customer" spam in the BTS

Hello all, I've recently received "Dear Customer" spam on a bug of mine. I've searched the BTS [1], and there are many, many, many of these spam postings in the BTS, see f.ex. [2]. I think it doesn't make sense to press "this bug log contains spam" on each of those pages. Better would be to go

Bug#799057: general: After my laptop hung and reset KDE4 doesn't start

Hello Vitaly, Am 15.09.2015 um 12:43 schrieb root: > Package: general > Severity: important > > [long Xsession dump without any further info] I'm closing your report. The "general" pseudo package is not a support channel to help debug and sort problems out. Please use one of the available

Re: Bug#798202: ITP: fonts-leckerli-one -- Leckerli One font

The URL entry below is broken. *t Am 06.09.2015 um 20:05 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Gioele Barabucci > > * Package name: fonts-leckerli-one > Version : 2011 > Upstream Author : Gesine Todt > * URL : >

Re: BUG: Debian Jessie as KVM guest on GlusterFS backend

Hello Roman, debian-devel is not the right place to ask support questions. Please try any of Debian's official support channls: https://www.debian.org/support https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ http://forums.debian.net/ irc://irc.oftc.net/debian *t Am 14.07.2015 um 11:16 schrieb Roman:

Re: Bug#790933: ITP: drive - Google Drive tool

Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak: It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink drive to it, which would allow you to give the binary name over easier Top-posting in a thread breaks the flow of the messages - as you can see here. The way to go here would be the alternatives

Re: Status on ddeb support in Debian

May I suggest you add: What is it? === * ddeb's are Debian packages with the extenstion .ddeb that contain debugging symbols and are built implicitly. - A package foo_1.23.deb will receive a corresponding foo_1.23-dbgsym.ddeb package. - ddebs are built automatically by

Re: Xen PVUSB - Debian 8

Am 16.06.2015 um 11:19 schrieb pietrop: Hi all, I am trying to setup a Debian 8 machine running XEN, which I've installed from the package manager, to use the USB passthrough. It looks like I need to use the module xen-usbfront and xen-usbback, which I can't find in the /lib/modules/(my

Re: Bug#765953: Wifi issues. Firmware package not fixed in testing release

Am 10.06.2015 um 19:10 schrieb Acommon LinuxUser: Hi, I submitted a bug about 8 months ago, but I didn't receive any reply. I updated my Debian system to the testing release (stretch) because a new version of the firmware-realtek package has been released for it, but it didn't solve the

Re: Regarding text display issues

Hello Himanshu Shekar, Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Himanshu Shekhar: Hello I am a Linux enthusiast and have started using Debian a few days back after using Ubuntu for 2 years. Debian is really awesome and doesn't crash. Well, right now I have two major issues : 1. Debian cannot display

Bug#787239: Too little specific information in bug report

reassing 787239 systemd thanks This email is going Bcc: to control@b.d.o - now on to further feedback: Hello Shaman, On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Shaman wrote: what init system are you using? - carefully look above: Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Ah, sorry, I didn't look carefully

Bug#787239: Too little specific information in bug report

Hello Shaman, I'd suggest you go to a debian support channel to discuss/solve your problem: https://www.debian.org/support https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ http://forums.debian.net/ http://ask.debian.net/ irc://irc.oftc.net/debian As is your bug report contains far too little

Re: setlocale doesn't change the language. Why?

Am 12.03.2015 um 06:50 schrieb Joerg Desch: Am Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:16:20 +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:27:21PM +, Joerg Desch wrote: Switch to 'en' New LOCALE: 'C' Hello World Switch to 'de' New LOCALE: 'C' Hello World So these cases are expected to

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

Am 13.02.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Riley Baird: On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:16:39 +0100 Tomas Pospisek t...@sourcepole.ch wrote: Am 12.02.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Riley Baird: Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much

Bug#777700: (no subject)

reassign 00 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 thanks Since Debian is preparing to release the next version of its distribution I guess that the linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 from the Debian wheezy distribution will very probably not ever backport support for and thus autodetect your RTL8723AE

Re: jessie not mounting all filesystems

Am 29.01.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Daniel Pocock: I just upgraded a system with many filesystems to jessie On many occasions when I boot this system it is failing to mount one of the filesystems and systemd gives the emergency login prompt It is not always the same filesystem though, it seems

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

Am 19.01.2015 um 02:03 schrieb Ben Hutchings: On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 08:37 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and

Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

Am 18.01.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Andreas Tille: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:07:35PM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote: we have had no discussion over #773359; your response is

  1   2   >