Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Felix Cheung
n 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support > model that will be etc. > > Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the > community. > > > > Fro

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-30 Thread Felix Cheung
whichever is most appropriate, or give further specific advice. Thanks Joe On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung wrote: > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to >

Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-24 Thread Felix Cheung
I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to vote too https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo From: Felix Cheung Sent: Monday, January 24

Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-24 Thread Felix Cheung
Shouldn’t this be a vote? Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356 From: Joe Fagan Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence Dear mentors, We

Re: [DISCUSS] Official Docker Image for Apache AGE

2022-01-02 Thread Felix Cheung
Pls see https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#dockerhub Example https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-12781 From: Eya Badal Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:58:13 PM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE Viewer (incubating) 1.0.0-rc0

2021-12-30 Thread Felix Cheung
lots of dependencies - are these licenses reviewed and handled in the LICENSE file? https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/backend/package.json https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/frontend/package.jso\ this requires a component - again could be a LICENSE

Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

2021-12-05 Thread Felix Cheung
That looks good to me. +1 To note, 0.6 is not on “Download” on https://age.apache.org/ From: John Gemignani Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 5:55:40 PM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) Release v0.6.0

2021-11-22 Thread Felix Cheung
As a reminder, when a vote is reset, it should have a new git tag and a new release share. git tag should increment from rc0, rc1, rc2 etc - optionally, this gives reviewers a way to see the changes/diffs and will help move the voting process along better. ie.

RE: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

2021-11-14 Thread Felix Cheung
Great to hear. I reviewed the maturity model. 1) do you have the breakdown on the PPMC membership on affiliation (companies)? And PPMC growth? 2) Is there a list of community members (committer and PPMC? It was mentioned in the maturity model item CS10 but not sure I see it on the

RE: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-17 Thread Felix Cheung
dom+Cir+%23260,+Santa+Clara,+CA+95054/ > > bitnine.net > > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 5:28 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > > > There bundle also applies to the source release. However, if you are > > certain none of the source code file or snippet is from the Postgres code

RE: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-10 Thread Felix Cheung
nd LICENSE. > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > > > Checking this release, not a blocker but a question: > > > > > > - incubating in name > > > > - signature and hash fine > > > > KEYS file - you should try to sign fi

RE: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-03 Thread Felix Cheung
Checking this release, not a blocker but a question: - incubating in name - signature and hash fine KEYS file - you should try to sign files with @apache.org issuer email - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE The PostgreSQL license - is it because of code file taken from the project

Incubator disclaimer missing from podling websites

2021-09-17 Thread Felix Cheung
Hello, Please look into the website -- Forwarded message - From: sebb Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:35 AM Subject: Incubator disclaimer missing from several podling websites To: general As the subject says: the disclaimer is missing from the following websites: Age

Download pages and links to podling releases

2021-09-17 Thread Felix Cheung
Hello, Could we look into the download page please? -- Forwarded message - From: Justin Mclean Date: Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 6:18 PM Subject: [MENTORS] Download pages and links to podling releases To: Hi, Can mentors please make themselves familiar with the requirements for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0

2021-07-24 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 Though it will be great to fix soon: *incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - Check: All source files have ASF headers about 20 source files for tests do not have the Apache header.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Sub Project - Visualization Tool

2021-06-11 Thread Felix Cheung
Sounds great. Is this already built? If it is, it is a software donation (software grant process) On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eya Badal wrote: > Dear Everyone, > @All Mentors > > I hope you are doing great. > > We would like to discuss the possibility of having a sub-project for > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0

2021-04-18 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 drivers/nodejs/src/index.ts - is there a reason this file does not have Apache License header? - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - source files have ASF headers - see note at the top

Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support

2021-03-09 Thread Felix Cheung
I’d like to point out the while it is convenient, as per policy, an Apache project should not have “official” or dev binaries that created nightly or similarly that is not an approved, voted release. In other words, dev tag on development branch should be clearly marked as not an official

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)

2021-02-04 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 Notes from checks: incubating in name the file should probably be called apache-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz instead of incubator-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-18 Thread Felix Cheung
disclaimer. Please advise. We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. Best regards, On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > From: Eya Badal > Sent:

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-17 Thread Felix Cheung
the feedback. >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and ask >everyone to vote? On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > just the mentor. > > A good vote thread mig

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-14 Thread Felix Cheung
Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be just the mentor. A good vote thread might be like: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html 1. md5 - should not include 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020

2020-11-30 Thread Felix Cheung
Reminder: From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 4:01:34 PM To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020

2020-09-01 Thread Felix Cheung
Any volunteers to write this report? From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:55:20 PM To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020

2020-07-31 Thread Felix Cheung
Any one could take a shot at the report? From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 1:22:06 AM To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf

Podling report

2020-06-30 Thread Felix Cheung
Hi! Any volunteer to draft the report? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/July2020